| Literature DB >> 27348125 |
Steve Jordan1, J Joseph Giersch2, Clint C Muhlfeld2,3, Scott Hotaling4, Liz Fanning1, Tyler H Tappenbeck3, Gordon Luikart3.
Abstract
Much remains unknown about the genetic status and population connectivity of high-elevation and high-latitude freshwater invertebrates, which often persist near snow and ice masses that are disappearing due to climate change. Here we report on the conservation genetics of the meltwater stonefly Lednia tumana (Ricker) of Montana, USA, a cold-water obligate species. We sequenced 1530 bp of mtDNA from 116 L. tumana individuals representing "historic" (>10 yr old) and 2010 populations. The dominant haplotype was common in both time periods, while the second-most-common haplotype was found only in historic samples, having been lost in the interim. The 2010 populations also showed reduced gene and nucleotide diversity and increased genetic isolation. We found lower genetic diversity in L. tumana compared to two other North American stonefly species, Amphinemura linda (Ricker) and Pteronarcys californica Newport. Our results imply small effective sizes, increased fragmentation, limited gene flow, and loss of genetic variation among contemporary L. tumana populations, which can lead to reduced adaptive capacity and increased extinction risk. This study reinforces concerns that ongoing glacier loss threatens the persistence of L. tumana, and provides baseline data and analysis of how future environmental change could impact populations of similar organisms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27348125 PMCID: PMC4922825 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157386
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Sampling sites, sample sizes, and concatenated COI and CytB allele frequencies for Lednia tumana populations in the Glacier National Park region of Montana, USA.
All sites without collecting dates were sampled in summer 2010. Individual haplotype colors correspond to those in Fig 2. Public domain imagery courtesy U. S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency.
Sampling and demographic information for 116 Lednia tumana individuals.
Shaded boxes indicate adjacent sites that were pooled for combined analysis, and the Combined n refers to the combined totals of those sites.
| Combined | Larvae | Adults | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | n | n | Date | COI | CytB | undet | undet | Male | Female | Male | Female |
| 3 | 8 | 6-Sep-97 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| 2 | 6-Oct-98 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
| 1 | 3-Aug-98 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 1 | 29-Jul-98 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 1 | 28-Jul-98 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 3 | 6-Oct-10 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| 4 | 3-Sep-10 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | ||||||
| 1 | 12 | 7-Sep-10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 6 | 7-Sep-10 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| 5 | 21-Aug-10 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | ||||||
| 7 | 12-Sep-05 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 5 | ||||||
| 15 | 31 | 27-Aug-10 | 12 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 12 | ||||
| 7 | 27-Aug-10 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 6 | ||||||
| 7 | 27-Aug-10 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 4 | ||||||
| 2 | 27-Aug-10 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
| 7 | 11-Sep-10 | 0 | 7 | 7 | |||||||
| 2 | 8 | 11-Sep-10 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| 6 | 25-Aug-10 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 14-Aug-05 | 0 | 3 | 3 | |||||||
| 15 | 33 | 13-Sep-10 | 14 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 2 | |||
| 18 | 13-Sep-10 | 17 | 14 | 1 | 14 | 3 |
Fig 2Minimum-spanning haplotype network for concatenated COI and CytB data from 116 Lednia tumana individuals.
Individual haplotype colors correspond to those in Fig 1.
Fig 3Gene (A), nucleotide (B), and allelic (C) diversity for populations of three species of Plecoptera. Allelic diversity was estimated using the rarefaction method implemented in HP-RARE [28].
Summary of results from population genetic analyses.
| Global Fst | Mean Pop. Allelic Diversity | Hs_est | Ht_est | G_est | G_Hedrick | D_est | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.32 | 2.2 | 0.618 | 0.631 | 0.021 | 0.059 | 0.039 | |
| 0.21 | 0.605 | 0.626 | 0.034 | 0.093 | 0.062 | ||
| 0.06 | 0.640 | 0.639 | -0.003 | -0.012 | -0.007 | ||
| -0.02 | 6.1 | ||||||
| 0.24 | 3.6 |
Fig 4Estimates of Gst analog 95% confidence intervals from SMOGD [29] for historic and 2010 populations of L. tumana.