Literature DB >> 27347841

Evaluation and optimization of the extended information process unit (E-IPU) validation module integrating the sysmex flag systems and the recommendations of the French-speaking cellular hematology group (GFHC).

Edouard Cornet1, François Mullier2, Noemie Despas2, Hugues Jacqmin2, Carole Geara1, Marouane Boubaya3, Bernard Chatelain2, Xavier Troussard1.   

Abstract

The French-Speaking Cellular Haematology Group (GFHC) recently published criteria for microscopic analysis of a blood smears when a hemogram is requested. In order to evaluate and improve these recommendations using an XN (Sysmex) analyzer, we assessed 31,836 samples categorized into two sub-groups of patients either receiving or not receiving care in the clinical hematology/oncology departments of two university hospitals. By combining the manufacturer's recommendations and the GFHC recommendations, 21.3% of samples had a positive review flag in phase 1 of our study (17,991 samples). In phase 2 (13,845 samples), increasing the immature granulocytes (IG) percentage from 5-10% as a review trigger threshold, and ignoring slides with isolated flags 'PLT HIGH' (thrombocytosis) or 'MCV LOW' (microcytosis) or 'Blast/Abn Lymph and Atypical Lymph' (blast cells/abnormal lymphocytes and atypical lymphocytes) (in the absence of abnormal cells on a previous blood smear within 72 h), enabled us to significantly reduce the number of slides reviewed from 21.3-15.0% (p < 0.0001), without loss of clinical value. This decrease occurred in both sub-groups (hematology 48.7-38.0%, non-hematology 18.3-11.7%, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, the application of the GFHC criteria adapted to XN analyzers has enabled us to optimize the hematology laboratory processes, and thus reduce the production costs and the turnaround time of hemogram results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical techniques; automated blood counts; decision support systems; evidence-based laboratory medicine; hematologic diseases; hematology; laboratory management; laboratory routines and automation; laboratory standardization; management; medical biochemistry; microscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27347841     DOI: 10.1080/00365513.2016.1199049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest        ISSN: 0036-5513            Impact factor:   1.713


  3 in total

1.  A hierarchical approach in the diagnostic workflow of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: Pivotal role of the "Mono-dysplasia-score" combined with flow cytometric quantification of monocyte subsets.

Authors:  Jaja Zhu; Elise Sourdeau; Honorine Aubert; Sylvain Clauser; Agathe Maillon; Claude Capron; Katayoun Jondeau; Emily Ronez; Francoise Schillinger; Francine Garnache-Ottou; Edouard Cornet; Valérie Bardet
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Evaluation of criteria of manual blood smear review following automated complete blood counts in a large university hospital.

Authors:  Samuel Ricardo Comar; Mariester Malvezzi; Ricardo Pasquini
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2017-07-31

Review 3.  Platelet Counting: Ugly Traps and Good Advice. Proposals from the French-Speaking Cellular Hematology Group (GFHC).

Authors:  Véronique Baccini; Franck Geneviève; Hugues Jacqmin; Bernard Chatelain; Sandrine Girard; Soraya Wuilleme; Aurélie Vedrenne; Eric Guiheneuf; Marie Toussaint-Hacquard; Fanny Everaere; Michel Soulard; Jean-François Lesesve; Valérie Bardet
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.