Literature DB >> 27347433

An Innovative Approach to Pharmacy Law Education Utilizing a Mock Board of Pharmacy Meeting.

D Todd Bess1, Jade Taylor2, Carol A Schwab3, Junling Wang1, Jason A Carter4.   

Abstract

A thorough understanding of pharmacy law by students is important in the molding of future pharmacy practitioners but a standardized template for the best way to educate students in this area has not been created. A mock Board of Pharmacy meeting was designed and incorporated into the Pharmacy Law course to meet the ACPE accreditation standards at the University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy. Students acted as Board of Pharmacy members and utilized technology to decide outcomes of cases and requests addressed in a typical 2 day Tennessee Board of Pharmacy meeting. The actual responses to those cases, as well as similar cases and requests addressed over a 5 year period, were revealed to students after they made motions on mock scenarios. Student participation in this interactive learning experience resulted in good understanding of the rules and regulations of pharmacy practice and the consequences associated with violating regulations. Such mock Board of Pharmacy meeting is recommended for future pharmacy law education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mock Board of Pharmacy meeting; pharmacy law; simulated educational model

Year:  2016        PMID: 27347433      PMCID: PMC4917285          DOI: 10.24926/iip.v7i1.419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innov Pharm        ISSN: 2155-0417


  9 in total

1.  An interdisciplinary mock trial involving pharmacy, law, and ethics.

Authors:  A E Broeseker; M M Jones
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 2.  It's ethical, but is it legal? Teaching ethics and law in the medical school curriculum.

Authors:  R S Olick
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  2001-02

3.  Teaching malpractice litigation in a mock trial setting: a center for perinatal medicine and law.

Authors:  William M Gilbert; Donald E Fadjo; David J Bills; Fred K Morrison; Michael P Sherman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Students' views regarding selecting medicine as a profession.

Authors:  Syed Muhammad Ali Saad; Syeda Shahzeen Fatima; Ali Ahmad Faruqi
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 0.781

5.  Prepared for practice? Law teaching and assessment in UK medical schools.

Authors:  Michael Preston-Shoot; Judy McKimm
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Motivating factors influencing college students' choice of academic major.

Authors:  Flora Keshishian; Joseph M Brocavich; R Thomas Boone; Somnath Pal
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  The current state of medical school education in bioethics, health law, and health economics.

Authors:  Govind C Persad; Linden Elder; Laura Sedig; Leonardo Flores; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  Towards effective outcomes in teaching, learning and assessment of law in medical education.

Authors:  Michael Preston-Shoot; Judy McKimm
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  The Jay Healey technique: teaching law and ethics to medical and dental students.

Authors:  B B Blechner; C L Hager; N R Williams
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  1994
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  A new way of teaching an old subject: Pharmacy Law and Ethics.

Authors:  S Chetty; V Bangalee; F Oosthuizen
Journal:  Afr J Health Prof Educ       Date:  2018-04-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.