Literature DB >> 27347097

Biological characteristics of side population cells in a self-established human ovarian cancer cell line.

Zhentong Wei1, Shuang Lv2, Yishu Wang2, Meiyu Sun2, Guangfan Chi2, Jun Guo2, Peiye Song2, Xiaoyu Fu2, Songling Zhang3, Yulin Li2.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to establish an ovarian cancer (OC) cell line from ascites of an ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma patient and investigate the biological characteristics of its side population (SP) cells. The OC cell line was established by isolating, purifying and subculturing primary cells from ascites of an ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma patient (stage IIIc; grade 3). SP and non-SP (NSP) cells were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and cultured in serum-free medium and soft agar to compare the tumorsphere and colony formation capacities. Furthermore, SP and NSP cell tumorigenesis was examined by subcutaneous and intraperitoneal injection of the cells to non-obese diabetic/severe combined immune deficiency (NOD/SCID) mice. Drug resistance to cisplatin was examined by cell counting kit-8. The OC cell line was successfully established from ascites of an ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma patient, which exhibited properties similar to primary tumors subsequent to >50 passages and >2 years of culture. The SP cell ratio was 0.38% in the OC cell line, and a similar SP cell ratio (0.39%) was observed when sorted SP cells were cultured for 3 weeks. Compared with NSP cells, SP cells exhibited increased abilities in differentiation and tumorsphere and colony formation, in addition to the formation of xenografted tumors and ascites and metastasis of the tumors in NOD/SCID mice, even at low cell numbers (3.0×103 cells). The xenografted tumors demonstrated histological features similar to primary tumors and expressed the ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma marker CA125. In addition, SP cells demonstrated a significantly stronger drug resistance to cisplatin compared with NSP and unsorted cells, while treatment with verapamil, an inhibitor of ATP-binding cassette transporters, potently abrogated SP cell drug resistance. In conclusion, the present study verified SP cells from an established OC cell line and characterized the cells with self-renewal, differentiation, proliferation, tumorigenesis and stronger drug resistance capacities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  drug resistance; ovarian cancer; side population cells; tumorigenesis

Year:  2016        PMID: 27347097      PMCID: PMC4907021          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


Introduction

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the leading cause of mortality resulting from gynecological cancers, and worldwide, ~114,000 patients succumb to OC annually (1). Although OC patients exhibit a 5-year survival rate of 90% when treated at an early stage, 80% of patients cannot be diagnosed until the advanced stages; therefore, the 5-year survival rate is 30% (2). OC recurrence occurs in 70% of patients following surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy combined treatments, which causes patients to become insensitive to chemotherapy (3). Consequently, tumor recurrence and drug resistance are two common set-backs in the treatment of OC (4,5). Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a type of tumor cell that possess an unlimited potential for self-renewal and may differentiate into multiple tumor cell types (6). Numerous studies have demonstrated that CSCs possess various characteristics, including a silent phenotype, enhanced DNA repair capacity, expression of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters and anti-apoptotic proteins, and resistance to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy (6–14). Conventional chemotherapy may eliminate the majority of tumor cells, but it has little impact on rare stem cell-like cells; and remaining CSCs cause tumor recurrence and metastasis. Therefore, studies concerning cancer should consider CSCs as a vital target to achieve the complete ablation of tumors, and should not solely focus on temporarily shrinking the tumor mass. Goodell et al (15) reported that a small cell population isolated from murine bone marrow demonstrated distinct fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) results compared with the main cell population, termed the side population (SP) cells. Numerous studies have demonstrated that SP cells, isolated from numerous tumors, richly contain tumor-initiating cells that possess stem cell characteristics (16–20). A low-fluorescence staining phenotype is mediated by ABC transporters (21), which provide a functional method for isolating SP cells. Although SP cells have been successfully isolated from certain human and mouse ovarian cell lines (22,23), the present study established an immortalized OC cell line from primary cells in ascites and identified SP cells from this cell line. Additionally, the present study investigated the biological characteristics of the SP cells, including differentiation and tumorsphere and colony formation, in addition to xenografted tumor formation and ascites, metastasis and drug resistance of the xenograft tumors.

Materials and methods

Establishment of an ovarian cancer cell line

Primary cells were isolated from ascites of an ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma patient. Briefly, primary cells were harvested by centrifugation at 300 × g for 5 min and red blood cells were removed by 1X BD lysis buffer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) on ice for 1 min, followed by centrifugation at 300 × g for 3 min. Primary cells were cultured for 3 weeks in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco®; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Floating cells were collected and re-cultured. Subsequent to subculturing for 15 passages, primary cells were identified by a tumor xenograft model; the tumor tissues were examined with hematoxylin and eosin staining and CA125 immunostaining.

Isolation of side population cells

The cells were trypsinized, resuspended at 1.0×106 cells/ml in pre-warmed DMEM containing 2% flow cytometry staining buffer (CycleTEST™ PLUS DNA Reagent kit; BD Biosciences) and incubated at 37°C for 10 min. The cells were labeled with 5 µg/ml Invitrogen™ Hoechst 33342 dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C for 80 min, alone or combined with 50 mM verapamil (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), an inhibitor of ABC transporters. The cells were counterstained with 1 µg/ml propidium iodide. In total, 100,000 cells were analyzed on a BD Influx cell sorter (BD Biosciences) and data were processed by BD FACSDiva version 6.1.1 software (BD Biosciences).

Tumorsphere formation assay

A total of 500 SP and non-SP (NSP) cells were plated onto a 24-well ultra-low attachment plate, and cultured in a DMEM/F12 serum-free medium (Gibco®; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 4 µg/ml insulin (Sigma-Aldrich), 10% human leukocyte antigen B27 (Gibco®; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF; Sigma-Aldrich), and 20 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF; Sigma-Aldrich), for 10 days. Tumorspheres >50 mm in diameter were counted under a phase-contrast microscope (IX50; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

Soft agar colony formation assay

A total of 200 SP and NSP cells were resuspended in a 0.8 ml growth medium (DMEM with EGF, bFGF and B27) containing 0.3% low-melting agarose (Sigma-Aldrich) and plated 3 times onto a 24-well plate pre-coated with a base layer of 0.8 ml growth medium containing 0.6% low-melting agarose. The plates were incubated for 14–15 days until the size of colonies was large enough to count. Colonies >75 µm in diameter or colonies that possessed >50 cells were counted as positive colonies.

Xenograft tumor assay

In total, 45 female 5-week old non-obese diabetic-severe combined immune deficiency (NOD/SCID) mice weighing 16–20 g were purchased from Vital River Laboratories, Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The mice were housed in a sterilized room with 12 h light/dark cycle, at a temperature of 22°C with 40–60% humidity. Food and water were provided ad libitum. Animal experiment protocols were approved by the Ethical Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University (Changchun, China). Subcutaneously, 1.0×106 OC cells were injected into the dorsal flank of 5-week-old female NOD/SCID mice, and tumor formation and growth were observed after 6 weeks. SP and NSP cells were sorted by FACS and resuspended in serum-free DMEM. In 0.1 ml DMEM, 3.0×103 or 3.0×104 NSP and SP cells were subcutaneously injected into the dorsal flank of 5-week-old female NOD/SCID mice, or intraperitoneally injected into 5-week-old female NOD/SCID mice (n=5). Formation of tumor and ascites were examined subsequent to 3 weeks.

Drug resistance assay

SP, NSP and unsorted cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 3,000 cells/well. Subsequent to 24-h culture, cells were treated with 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, 2.00, 4.00, 8.00 and 16.00 µg/ml cisplatin (Sigma-Aldrich) for 72 h. All treatments were run in triplicates. Cells without cisplatin treatment were used as negative controls. Following treatment, all cells were treated with 10 ml cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) reagent (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Kumamoto, Japan) in 100 ml complete high-glucose DMEM (Gibco®; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and cultured in normal culture conditions (DMEM with 10% FBS, 5% CO2 at 37°C) for 2.5 h. In total, 3 wells without cells were used as blank controls. Absorbance at 490 nm was examined by a Model 550 microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). Cell viability was determined by the following formula: Cell viability (%) = [optical density (OD) values of drug-treated cells – OD values of blank controls] / (OD values of negative cells – OD values of blank control) × 100. Cisplatin doses of 50% growth inhibition (IC50) in SP, NSP and unsorted cells were calculated using Prism software, version 4.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). To additionally verify SP cell drug resistance, unsorted cells were treated with the IC50 dose of cisplatin for 3 h and cultured in a drug-free complete medium for 72 h. The SP cell ratio was examined by FACS. To investigate the association between drug resistance and ABC transporters, SP cells were treated with IC50 dose of cisplatin or cisplatin with verapamil for 3 h, and were then cultured in a drug-free complete medium for 72 h. Cell viability was examined using the CCK-8 kit.

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance of differences between two groups was analyzed using two-tailed unpaired Student's t-test. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significantly difference.

Results

Establishment of human ovarian cancer cell line from ascites

Primary OC cells were purified from ascites of an ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma patient (stage IIIc; grade 3) and cultured for >50 passages over 2 years. Subcutaneously, 1.0×106 OC cells were injected into the dorsal thigh of female NOD/SCID mice and tumor formation was examined subsequent to 8 weeks (Fig. 1A). No histological or cytological differences were observed between primary and xenografted tumors; the two tumors demonstrated poorly differentiated serous cystadenocarcinoma (Fig. 1B). Furthermore, the expression of ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma marker CA125 was observed in the xenografted tumors (Fig. 1C) (24).
Figure 1.

OC cell line generation. (A) Tumorigenesis of an established OC cell line: 1.0×106 OC cells were injected into the dorsal subcutaneous thigh of female non-obese diabetic/severe combined immune deficiency mice (n=3) and the tumor was observed 8 weeks later. (B) Histology of a primary OC tumor and xenografted OC tumor from an established OC cell line (hematoxylin and eosin staining; scale bar=100 mm). (C) Expression of ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma marker CA125 in xenografted tumors by immunohistochemistry. Scale bar=100 mm. OC, ovarian cancer.

Isolation of SP cells from established OC cell line

SP cells possess low-fluorescence staining properties (21). FACS was used in the present study to isolate SP cells using Hoechst 33342 staining. Verapamil is an ABC transporter protein inhibitor that may effectively reduce the SP cell ratio (25). The present study observed weak Hoechst staining in certain cells, indicating that these are SP cells (Fig. 2A). The SP cell ratio in the OC cell line was 0.38% (n=5), while the SP cell ratio was significantly reduced in the presence of verapamil (P=0.001; Fig. 2B and C).
Figure 2.

Identification of SP cells. (A) SP cell staining by Hoechst 33342 (left panel): Cells with low Hoechst staining (arrow) are SP cells. Contrast phase (right panel) was used to demonstrate the presence of SP cells. Population of SP cells in an established OC cell line with or without verapamil, which was (B) analyzed by FACS and (n=1) (C) quantified (P<0.001; n=3). Differentiation potential of SP and NSP cells: 1,000 SP and NSP cells were cultured for 3 weeks and the SP cell ratio was (D) analyzed by FACS (n=1) and (E) quantified (P<0.01; n=3). SP, side population; OC, ovarian cancer; NSP, non-SP.

Biological characteristics of SP cells: Differentiation potential of SP and NSP cells

To evaluate the differentiation potential of isolated SP cells, 1×103 SP and NSP cells were cultured for 3 weeks and the SP cell ratios were compared between the two groups. The average SP ratio was 0.39% following SP cell culture for 3 weeks in vitro, which was a similar ratio to unsorted OC cells. The average SP ratio was 0.06% in NSP cells subsequent to 3 weeks of culture, which was significantly lower compared with SP and unsorted OC cells (P=0.004; Fig. 2D and E). These results indicate that SP cells exhibited competent self-renewal and differentiation capacities in vitro, but NSP cells did not.

In vitro tumorsphere formation of SP and NSP cells

In total, 500 single SP and NSP cells were cultured in a serum-free medium supplemented with growth factor for 10 days, and tumorsphere formation was calculated. The present study demonstrated that the average number of tumorspheres formed in SP and NSP cells were 42.7 and 6.3, respectively (P=0.009; Fig. 3A and B). These data indicate that SP cells possess improved self-renewal capacities compared with NSP cells.
Figure 3.

Tumorsphere and colony formation of SP and NSP cells. (A) Representative images of tumorsphere formation from SP (left panel) and NSP (right panel) cells. (B) Average number of tumorspheres/field in SP and NSP cells. Spheres >50 µm in size were counted (P<0.01; n=3). (C) Representative images of colony formation from SP (left panel) and NSP (right panel) cells. (D) Colony formation efficiency in SP and NSP cells. Clusters of >50 cells were counted (*P<0.01; n=3). SP, side population; NSP, non-SP.

SP and NSP cell colony formation

To further verify the present findings, 500 SP and NSP cells were seeded in soft agar medium and the cells were cultured for 14–15 days to observe the colony formation ratio. The present study observed that the colony formation ratio in SP cells (41.33%) was significantly higher compared with NSP cells (8.93%) (P=0.008; Fig. 3C and D). These data suggest that SP cells have greater colony formation capacities than NSP cells.

Tumorigenesis potential of SP and NSP cells

To evaluate the tumorigenesis potential of SP and NSP cells, 3.0×104 and 3.0×103 SP and NSP cells were subcutaneously injected into the dorsal flank of the NOD/SCID mice. Xenografted tumors were observed in all 5 mice at 52 (3.0×104 cells) and 63 (3.0×103 cells) days subsequent to the injection of SP cells. None of the mice formed tumors 70 days following the injection of 3.0×103 NSP cells, and only 1 xenografted tumor was observed in 1 mouse at 54 days subsequent to injection of 3.0×104 NSP cells (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, the present study also evaluated the intraperitoneal tumorigenesis of SP and NSP cells. Following intraperitoneal injection of 3.0×104 cells into NOD/SCID mice, tumors were observed in the abdominal cavities of all 5 mice by 45 days post-injection, however, only 1 mouse demonstrated ascites and metastasis after 56 days (Fig. 4B and C). At 56 days post subcutaneous injection of 3.0×104 cells, the xenografted tumor size from SP cells was clearly larger than the size of the tumor from NSP cells (Fig. 4C). Similarly, the present study observed blood ascites and clear metastasis in the abdominal cavity of all 5 mice following the intraperitoneal injection of 3.0×103 SP cells for 50 days, but this was not observed in any of the mice following the injection of the same amount of NSP cells for 56 days (Fig. 4B and D). These data indicate that the tumorigenesis potential of SP cells was significantly greater compared with NSP cells.
Figure 4.

SP and NSP cell tumor formation. (A) Tumor-free curve in NOD/SCID mice following a (A) subcutaneous injection or (B) intraperitoneal injection of 3.0×104 or 3.0×103 SP and NSP cells (n=5; P-value from log rank test). Xenografted tumor characteristics from SP and NSP cells. (C) 3.0×104 SP and NSP cells were subcutaneously injected into NOD/SCID mice and xenografted tumors were observed in SP and NSP groups following 56 days (left panel). The tumor size from SP cells (top right panels) was significantly larger compared with that in the NSP cells (bottom right panels). (D) 3.0×103 SP and NSP cells were intraperitoneally injected into NOD/SCID mice. Blood ascites (left panel) and clear metastasis (right panel) in the abdominal cavity were observed in the SP group following 42 days. SP, side population; NSP, non-SP; NOD/SCID, non-obese diabetic/severe combined immune deficiency.

Histological and cytological characteristics

In addition, the present study investigated the histological and cytological differences between the primary and xenografted tumors. Similar to the primary tumors, xenografted tumors exhibited poorly differentiated serous cystadenocarcinoma histological and cytological features following subcutaneous and intraperitoneal injection (Fig. 5A). Furthermore, CA125 expression was observed in two types of xenografted tumors (Fig. 5B). These results verify that SP cells possess competent self-renewal and differentiation capacities in vivo.
Figure 5.

Histology and cytology of the different tumors. (A) Histology of primary tumor, subcutaneous xenografted tumor and intraperitoneal xenografted tumor (hematoxylin and eosin staining; scale bar=100 µm). (B) Expression of ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma marker CA125 in primary tumors, subcutaneous xenografted tumors and intraperitoneal xenografted tumors. Scale bar=100 µm.

Drug resistance of SP cells

To investigate the drug resistance properties of SP cells, the present study treated SP, NSP and unsorted cells with 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, 2.00, 4.00, 8.00 and 16.00 g/ml of cisplatin for 72 h and examined the cell viability using a CCK-8 kit. It was observed that the cell viability of SP cells was significantly higher compared with NSP and unsorted cells when treated with 1.0–4.0 g/ml of cisplatin (P=0.038 vs. NSP cells; P=0.042 vs. unsorted cells; Fig. 6A). However, there was no marked difference in cell viability following cisplatin treatment between NSP and unsorted cells (Fig. 6A). IC50 values for unsorted, SP and NSP cells were 1.75, 2.38 and 1.63 and µg/ml, respectively, and the IC50 value of SP cells was significantly higher than those of the NSP and unsorted cells (P=0.038 vs. NSP cells; P=0.042 vs. unsorted cells; Fig. 6B). These results indicate that SP cells exhibit greater drug resistance capacities compared with NSP and unsorted cells. Furthermore, the SP cell ratio to unsorted cells was significantly elevated following cisplatin treatment, from 0.38 to 10.18% (P=0.007; Fig. 6C). These data support the theory that SP cells are more resistant to cisplatin treatment compared with NSP and unsorted cells.
Figure 6.

Drug resistance of SP, NSP and unsorted cells to cisplatin. (A) Titration of optimal cisplatin doses for SP, NSP and unsorted cells. (B) Cisplatin doses of 50% growth inhibition values for SP, NSP and unsorted cells, which were calculated by Prism version 4.0 software (*P<0.05 vs. unsorted and NSP cells; n=3). (C) Cisplatin treatment increased the SP cell ratio in unsorted cells (P<0.01; n=3). (D) SP cell drug resistance to cisplatin was abrogated by verapamil (P<0.01; n=3). SP, side population; NSP, non-SP.

To clarify the association between drug resistance of SP cells and ABC transporters, the SP cells were treated with a IC50 dose of cisplatin or cisplatin + verapamil. The results demonstrated that cell viability was 71.41% following cisplatin treatment, while it was reduced to 6.00% following treatment with cisplatin + verapamil (P=0.006; Fig. 6D). These data indicate that verapamil increases the sensitivity of SP cells to cisplatin treatment, suggesting that the drug resistance of SP cells to cisplatin depends on the drug efflux function of ABC transporters.

Discussion

Cancer cell lines are widely used in research to study the biology of cancer and examine cancer treatments. These cell lines can be cultured for long periods of time and share the tumor-associated biological characteristics of the original tumor (26). The present study successfully established an OC cell line from primary cells in ascites of an OC patient. This cell line had been passaged for 50 generations over 2 years and exhibited immortalized characteristics. Injection of this cell line into NOD/SCID mice formed xenografted tumors that revealed histological and cytological features similar to primary tumors. Therefore, this cell line would be a valuable tool for future functional studies on OC cancer. Bonnet and Dick (27) first identified leukemia stem cells in 1997, which are tumor stem cells that have been isolated from various solid tumors, including breast, cerebral, colon, prostate, cervix and ovarian tumors (28–33). Numerous studies have demonstrated that certain molecular markers, including cluster of differentiation (CD)133, CD44 and CD117, may be used to isolate tumor stem cells (24,34,35). However, certain cancer stem cells may lack these specific cell surface markers, or one type of stem-cell marker may only be specific to a particular tumor (36). SP cells within tumors are a small proportion of cancer cells with stem-like properties, which can be isolated by FACS due to their increased ability to export certain compounds, including Hoechst 33342 and chemotherapeutic agents. SP sorting is a type of functional sorting that has general applicability, compared with sorting stem cells by cell surface markers. Previous studies have demonstrated that SP cells partly overlap with corresponding stem cells, but SP cells in certain tumors, even the same type of tumor from various individuals, do not have stem cell properties (37–40). Therefore, the present study sought to investigate important characteristics, including self-renewal, differentiation ability and high tumorigenicity of SP cells from an established OC cell line. The present study verified the average population of SP cells in our established cell line, which was 0.38%, and the present results are similar to a previous study (0.01–5.00%) (23). Stem cells have strong self-renewal capacities and form floating spheroids in a serum-free medium supplemented with growth factor, while differentiated tumor cells become apoptotic (6,24). The present study additionally demonstrated that isolated SP cells exhibited significantly increased capacities in cell differentiation, colony formation and in vivo tumorigenesis compared with NSP cells. Furthermore, xenografted tumors from subcutaneous and intraperitoneal injections of SP cells exhibited histological and cytological features similar to primary tumors. These data indicate that isolated SP cells possess a number of important similar characteristics to OC stem cells, such as self-renewal, differentiation and high tumorigenicity. In addition, the present study identified that 1.0×104 NSP cells was able to form tumors in a small proportion of mice, which contradicts previous studies (39,41). It is possible that NSP cells may become contaminated with SP cells that induce tumor formation during the long culture period of ~8 weeks. It is well established that OC stem-like SP cells are tumorigenic and chemoresistant (41,42). The present study observed that isolated SP cells were more resistant to the first-line OC chemotherapy drug cisplatin. In addition, cisplatin treatment significantly increased the SP cell ratio. This observation is consistent with a recent study, in which SP cell ratio in ascites of patients with OC following chemotherapy was significantly higher compared with ascites of those that did not undergo chemotherapy (41). In OC clinical treatments, the majority of patients would gradually develop drug resistance following chemotherapy, which may be caused by SP cell accumulation. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that ABC transporters are important in cisplatin-induced drug resistance in OC (43,44). The present study identified an ABC transporter inhibitor (verapamil) that potently abrogated SP cell resistance to cisplatin, which is consistent with previous observations in OC cell lines (12). These data indicate that SP cell drug resistance to cisplatin depends on the efflux function of ABC transporters, suggesting a promising therapy for drug-resistant OC. In addition, previous studies demonstrated that increased chemoresistance of SP cells is associated with diverse mechanisms, including alterations in signaling pathways and enzymes, reduced apoptosis and increased DNA repair (19,45,46). However, additional study is required to verify whether these mechanisms exist in SP cells from OC. In summary, the present study successfully isolated and established an OC cell line. Isolated SP cells from the established OC cell line possessed similar biological characteristics as cancer stem cells, including self-renewal, differentiation, proliferation, tumorigenesis and drug resistance. This cell line and SP cells provide valuable models for studying OC tumorigenesis and drug resistance mechanisms that may aid in developing specific therapies for targeting OC SP or stem cells.
  46 in total

Review 1.  Cancer of the ovary.

Authors:  Stephen A Cannistra
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Cancer stem cells--perspectives on current status and future directions: AACR Workshop on cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Michael F Clarke; John E Dick; Peter B Dirks; Connie J Eaves; Catriona H M Jamieson; D Leanne Jones; Jane Visvader; Irving L Weissman; Geoffrey M Wahl
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Mechanisms of cancer drug resistance.

Authors:  Michael M Gottesman
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 13.739

4.  Ovarian cancer stem cell-like side populations are enriched following chemotherapy and overexpress EZH2.

Authors:  Siân Rizzo; Jenny M Hersey; Paul Mellor; Wei Dai; Alessandra Santos-Silva; Daniel Liber; Louisa Luk; Ian Titley; Craig P Carden; Garry Box; David L Hudson; Stanley B Kaye; Robert Brown
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 6.261

5.  A human colon cancer cell capable of initiating tumour growth in immunodeficient mice.

Authors:  Catherine A O'Brien; Aaron Pollett; Steven Gallinger; John E Dick
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-11-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  ATP11B mediates platinum resistance in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Myrthala Moreno-Smith; J B Halder; Paul S Meltzer; Tamas A Gonda; Lingegowda S Mangala; Rajesha Rupaimoole; Chunhua Lu; Archana S Nagaraja; Kshipra M Gharpure; Yu Kang; Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo; Pablo E Vivas-Mejia; Behrouz Zand; Rosemarie Schmandt; Hua Wang; Robert R Langley; Nicholas B Jennings; Cristina Ivan; Jeremy E Coffin; Guillermo N Armaiz; Justin Bottsford-Miller; Sang Bae Kim; Margaret S Halleck; Mary J C Hendrix; William Bornman; Menashe Bar-Eli; Ju-Seog Lee; Zahid H Siddik; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Anil K Sood
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Identification of cells initiating human melanomas.

Authors:  Tobias Schatton; George F Murphy; Natasha Y Frank; Kazuhiro Yamaura; Ana Maria Waaga-Gasser; Martin Gasser; Qian Zhan; Stefan Jordan; Lyn M Duncan; Carsten Weishaupt; Robert C Fuhlbrigge; Thomas S Kupper; Mohamed H Sayegh; Markus H Frank
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Side population does not define stem cell-like cancer cells in the adrenocortical carcinoma cell line NCI h295R.

Authors:  Urs D Lichtenauer; Igor Shapiro; Klaus Geiger; Marcus Quinkler; Martin Fassnacht; Roland Nitschke; Klaus-Dieter Rückauer; Felix Beuschlein
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 4.736

9.  Identification and characterization of ovarian cancer-initiating cells from primary human tumors.

Authors:  Shu Zhang; Curt Balch; Michael W Chan; Hung-Cheng Lai; Daniela Matei; Jeanne M Schilder; Pearlly S Yan; Tim H-M Huang; Kenneth P Nephew
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  let-7 regulates self renewal and tumorigenicity of breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Fengyan Yu; Herui Yao; Pengcheng Zhu; Xiaoqin Zhang; Qiuhui Pan; Chang Gong; Yijun Huang; Xiaoqu Hu; Fengxi Su; Judy Lieberman; Erwei Song
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  4 in total

1.  Antitumor effects of ivermectin at clinically feasible concentrations support its clinical development as a repositioned cancer drug.

Authors:  Mandy Juarez; Alejandro Schcolnik-Cabrera; Guadalupe Dominguez-Gomez; Alma Chavez-Blanco; Jose Diaz-Chavez; Alfonso Duenas-Gonzalez
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Downregulation of Foxo3 and TRIM31 by miR-551b in side population promotes cell proliferation, invasion, and drug resistance of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Zhentong Wei; Yan Liu; Yishu Wang; Yandong Zhang; Qinghua Luo; Xiaxia Man; Feng Wei; Xiaowei Yu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  The novel ZIP4 regulation and its role in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Qipeng Fan; Qingchun Cai; Pengfei Li; Wenyan Wang; Jing Wang; Emily Gerry; Tian-Li Wang; Ie-Ming Shih; Kenneth P Nephew; Yan Xu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-30

Review 4.  Management and potentialities of primary cancer cultures in preclinical and translational studies.

Authors:  Giacomo Miserocchi; Laura Mercatali; Chiara Liverani; Alessandro De Vita; Chiara Spadazzi; Federica Pieri; Alberto Bongiovanni; Federica Recine; Dino Amadori; Toni Ibrahim
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.531

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.