A M M van der Stouwe1, J W Elting2, J H van der Hoeven2, T van Laar3, K L Leenders3, N M Maurits4, M A J Tijssen3. 1. Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands. Electronic address: a.m.m.van.der.stouwe@umcg.nl.nl. 2. Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Distinguishing between different tremor disorders can be challenging. Some tremor disorders are thought to have typical tremor characteristics: the current study aims to provide sensitivity and specificity for five 'typical' tremor phenomena. METHODS: Retrospectively, we examined 210 tremor patients referred for electrophysiological recordings between January 2008 and January 2014. The final clinical diagnosis was used as the gold standard. The first step was to determine whether patients met neurophysiological criteria for their type of tremor. Once established, we focused on 'typical' characteristics: tremor frequency decrease upon loading (enhanced physiological tremor (EPT)), amplitude increase upon loading, distractibility and entrainment (functional tremor (FT)), and intention tremor (essential tremor (ET)). The prevalence of these phenomena in the 'typical' group was compared to the whole group. RESULTS: Most patients (87%) concurred with all core clinical neurophysiological criteria for their tremor type. We found a frequency decrease upon loading to be a specific (95%), but not a sensitive (42%) test for EPT. Distractibility and entrainment both scored high on sensitivity (92%, 91%) and specificity (94%, 91%) in FT, whereas a tremor amplitude increase was specific (92%), but not sensitive (22%). Intention tremor was a specific finding in ET (85%), but not a sensitive test (45%). Combination of characteristics improved sensitivity. CONCLUSION: In this study, we retrospectively determined sensitivity and specificity for five 'typical' tremor characteristics. Characteristics proved specific, but few were sensitive. These data on tremor phenomenology will help practicing neurologists to improve distinction between different tremor disorders.
INTRODUCTION: Distinguishing between different tremor disorders can be challenging. Some tremor disorders are thought to have typical tremor characteristics: the current study aims to provide sensitivity and specificity for five 'typical' tremor phenomena. METHODS: Retrospectively, we examined 210 tremorpatients referred for electrophysiological recordings between January 2008 and January 2014. The final clinical diagnosis was used as the gold standard. The first step was to determine whether patients met neurophysiological criteria for their type of tremor. Once established, we focused on 'typical' characteristics: tremor frequency decrease upon loading (enhanced physiological tremor (EPT)), amplitude increase upon loading, distractibility and entrainment (functional tremor (FT)), and intention tremor (essential tremor (ET)). The prevalence of these phenomena in the 'typical' group was compared to the whole group. RESULTS: Most patients (87%) concurred with all core clinical neurophysiological criteria for their tremor type. We found a frequency decrease upon loading to be a specific (95%), but not a sensitive (42%) test for EPT. Distractibility and entrainment both scored high on sensitivity (92%, 91%) and specificity (94%, 91%) in FT, whereas a tremor amplitude increase was specific (92%), but not sensitive (22%). Intention tremor was a specific finding in ET (85%), but not a sensitive test (45%). Combination of characteristics improved sensitivity. CONCLUSION: In this study, we retrospectively determined sensitivity and specificity for five 'typical' tremor characteristics. Characteristics proved specific, but few were sensitive. These data on tremor phenomenology will help practicing neurologists to improve distinction between different tremor disorders.
Authors: Kailash P Bhatia; Peter Bain; Nin Bajaj; Rodger J Elble; Mark Hallett; Elan D Louis; Jan Raethjen; Maria Stamelou; Claudia M Testa; Guenther Deuschl Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2017-11-30 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Annemarie Smid; Jan Willem J Elting; J Marc C van Dijk; Bert Otten; D L Marinus Oterdoom; Katalin Tamasi; Tjitske Heida; Teus van Laar; Gea Drost Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Rodi Zutt; Jan W Elting; Jonathan C van Zijl; J Han van der Hoeven; Christiaan M Roosendaal; Jeannette M Gelauff; Kathryn J Peall; Marina A J Tijssen Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jaron van de Wardt; A M Madelein van der Stouwe; Michiel Dirkx; Jan Willem J Elting; Bart Post; Marina Aj Tijssen; Rick C Helmich Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Edward M Bello; Madeline Blumenfeld; Joan Dao; Jordan D S Krieg; Lucius K Wilmerding; Matthew D Johnson Journal: Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) Date: 2021-09-13
Authors: Ramesh S Marapin; A M Madelein van der Stouwe; Bauke M de Jong; Jeannette M Gelauff; Victor M Vergara; Vince D Calhoun; Jelle R Dalenberg; Yasmine E M Dreissen; Johannes H T M Koelman; Marina A J Tijssen; Harm J van der Horn Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 4.881