Jorieke Konijnenbelt-Peters1, Charlotte van der Heijden1, Corine Ekhart2, Jacqueline Bos3, Jörgen Bruhn4, Cornelis Kramers3,5,6. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 2. Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 'sHertogenbosch, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Anaesthesiology, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 6. Department of Pharmacology-Toxicology, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) play an important role in multimodal pain management. In patients with a contraindication for NSAIDs, pain management is challenging. A recent Dutch anesthesiology guideline propagates the use of metamizole (dipyrone) in these patients. Metamizole is a controversial drug, its use being previously discouraged because of the risk for agranulocytosis. We discuss whether metamizole could be an alternative to classical NSAIDs and opioids in postoperative pain management despite this drawback. METHOD: Literature review and pharmacovigilance research based on World Health Organization adverse effect registrations. RESULTS: Metamizole causes fewer gastric and duodenal ulcers than other nonselective NSAIDs, and the risk for bleeding is limited. It is unknown whether it is safer than a nonselective NSAID combined with a proton pump inhibitor. Although the drug appears to be safe for renal function in healthy volunteers, data in high-risk patients (eg, those with heart or renal failure) are lacking. The incidence of metamizole-induced agranulocytosis is controversial, but the risk is likely to be limited with short-term postoperative use in this selected group of patients. CONCLUSION: Although firm evidence is lacking, metamizole may be safer for the upper intestinal tract and kidneys than other NSAIDs, and could alternatively be used in patients with an increased risk for stomach or renal problems. Hereby, improved postoperative pain relief can potentially be achieved. The risk for metamizole-induced agranulocytosis is judged to be acceptable.
PURPOSE: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) play an important role in multimodal pain management. In patients with a contraindication for NSAIDs, pain management is challenging. A recent Dutch anesthesiology guideline propagates the use of metamizole (dipyrone) in these patients. Metamizole is a controversial drug, its use being previously discouraged because of the risk for agranulocytosis. We discuss whether metamizole could be an alternative to classical NSAIDs and opioids in postoperative pain management despite this drawback. METHOD: Literature review and pharmacovigilance research based on World Health Organization adverse effect registrations. RESULTS:Metamizole causes fewer gastric and duodenal ulcers than other nonselective NSAIDs, and the risk for bleeding is limited. It is unknown whether it is safer than a nonselective NSAID combined with a proton pump inhibitor. Although the drug appears to be safe for renal function in healthy volunteers, data in high-risk patients (eg, those with heart or renal failure) are lacking. The incidence of metamizole-induced agranulocytosis is controversial, but the risk is likely to be limited with short-term postoperative use in this selected group of patients. CONCLUSION: Although firm evidence is lacking, metamizole may be safer for the upper intestinal tract and kidneys than other NSAIDs, and could alternatively be used in patients with an increased risk for stomach or renal problems. Hereby, improved postoperative pain relief can potentially be achieved. The risk for metamizole-induced agranulocytosis is judged to be acceptable.
Authors: Alenka Premuš Marušič Kovačič; Martin Caprnda; Aleš Mrhar; Peter Kubatka; Igor Locatelli; Barbora Zolakova; Ludovit Gaspar; Robert Prosecky; Peter Kruzliak; Robert Staffa; Luis Rodrigo; Jozef Radonak; Danijel Petrovič Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: U M Stamer; T Stammschulte; J Erlenwein; W Koppert; S Freys; W Meißner; P Ahrens; E-M Brede; M Lindig; M Dusch; S Heitfeld; E Hoffmann; E A Lux; E Müller; D Pauli-Magnus; E Pogatzki-Zahn; C Quaisser-Kimpfbeck; U Ringeler; H Rittner; J Ulma; S Wirz Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: Richard H Parrish; Heather Monk Bodenstab; Dustin Carneal; Ryan M Cassity; William E Dager; Sara J Hyland; Jenna K Lovely; Alyssa Pollock; Tracy M Sparkes; Siu-Fun Wong Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-09-24 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Maira Isis S Stangler; João Pedro Neves Lubianca; Jaqueline Neves Lubianca; José Faibes Lubianca Neto Journal: Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2021-01-02
Authors: Valerie Dahm; Justin T Lui; Rudolfs Liepins; Joseph M Chen; Trung N Le; Christoph Arnoldner; Vincent Y W Lin Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2021-06-22