| Literature DB >> 27345372 |
Phillip I Tarr1, Barbara B Warner2.
Abstract
Late-onset neonatal bloodstream infections remain challenges in neonatology. Hand hygiene, line care, and judicious use of indwelling lines are welcome interventions, but might not reduce the incidence of late-onset neonatal bloodstream infections from bacteria originating in the gut. Accumulating data suggest that many pathogens causing late-onset neonatal bloodstream infections are of gut origin, including Gram-positive cocci. In addition to the host-canonical paradigm (i.e., all bacteria have equal risk of invasion and bloodstream infections are functions of variable infant susceptibility), we should now consider bacteria-canonical paradigms, whereby late-onset neonatal bloodstream infection is a function of colonization with a specific subset of bacteria with exceptional invasive potential. In either event, we can no longer be content to reactively approach late-onset neonatal bloodstream infections; instead we need to reduce the occurrences of these infections by broadening our scope of effort beyond line care, and determine the pre-invasive habitat of these pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: Gram-negative bacteria; Gram-positive bacteria; Gut microbes; Late-onset neonatal bloodstream infections
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27345372 DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2016.06.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Semin Fetal Neonatal Med ISSN: 1744-165X Impact factor: 3.926