Literature DB >> 27345132

Risk factors for bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Diogo Libânio1, Mariana Nuno Costa2, Pedro Pimentel-Nunes3, Mário Dinis-Ribeiro3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Postprocedural bleeding (PPB) is the most common adverse event associated with endoscopic resection. Several studies have tried to identify risk factors for PPB after gastric EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), with controversial results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify significant risk factors for PPB after gastric EMR and ESD.
METHODS: Three online databases were searched. Pooled odds ratio (OR) was computed for each risk factor using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran's Q test and I(2).
RESULTS: Seventy-four articles were included. Pooled PPB rate was 5.1% (95% confidence interval, 4.5%-5.7%), which did not vary according to different study designs. Male sex (OR, 1.25), cardiopathy (OR, 1.54), antithrombotic drugs (OR, 1.63), cirrhosis (OR, 1.76), chronic kidney disease (OR, 3.38), tumor size > 20 mm (OR, 2.70), resected specimen size > 30 mm (OR, 2.85), localization in the lesser curvature (OR, 1.74), flat/depressed morphology (OR, 1.43), carcinoma histology (OR, 1.46), and ulceration (OR, 1.64) were identified as significant risk factors for PPB, whereas age, hypertension, submucosal invasion, fibrosis, and localization (upper, middle, or lower third) were not. Procedure duration > 60 minutes (OR, 2.05) and the use of histamine-2 receptor antagonists instead of proton pump inhibitors (OR, 2.13) were the procedural factors associated with PPB, whereas endoscopist experience and preprocedural proton pump inhibitors were not. Second-look endoscopy was not associated with decreased PPB (OR, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, .85-2.12).
CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for PPB were identified that can help to guide management after gastric ESD, namely adjusting further management. Second-look endoscopy is not associated with decreased PPB.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27345132     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  25 in total

Review 1.  Heparin-Bridging Therapy and Risk of Bleeding After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasms: a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Veeravich Jaruvongvanich; Tomoki Sempokuya; Karn Wijarnpreecha; Patompong Ungprasert
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2018-03

2.  Risk Factors for Post-gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Bleeding with a Special Emphasis on Anticoagulant Therapy.

Authors:  Yosuke Toya; Masaki Endo; Tomofumi Oizumi; Risaburo Akasaka; Shunichi Yanai; Keisuke Kawasaki; Shotaro Nakamura; Makoto Eizuka; Yasuko Fujita; Noriyuki Uesugi; Tamotsu Sugai; Takayuki Matsumoto
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Yuyong Tan; Linna Tan; Jiaxi Lu; Jirong Huo; Deliang Liu
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-12-19

Review 4.  A narrative review of postoperative bleeding in patients with gastric cancer treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Li Liu; Hongqun Liu; Zhijie Feng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-02

5.  The Influence of Antiplatelet Drug Medication on Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Won Shik Shin; Dong Ki Ahn; Jung Soo Lee; In Sun Yoo; Ho Young Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-08-22

6.  Renal Dysfunction is an Independent Risk Factor for Rebleeding After Endoscopic Hemostasis in Patients with Peptic Ulcer Bleeding.

Authors:  Hideharu Ogiyama; Shusaku Tsutsui; Yoko Murayama; Kensuke Matsushima; Shingo Maeda; Shin Satake; Kayo Seto; Masashi Horiki; Tamana Sanomura; Kazuho Imanaka; Hiroyasu Iishi
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Predicting outcomes of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection using a Bayesian approach: a step for individualized risk assessment.

Authors:  Diogo Libânio; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro; Pedro Pimentel-Nunes; Cláudia Camila Dias; Pedro Pereira Rodrigues
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-06-23

8.  Splash M-knife versus Flush Knife BT in the technical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Mitsuru Esaki; Sho Suzuki; Yasuyo Hayashi; Azusa Yokoyama; Shuichi Abe; Taizo Hosokawa; Haruei Ogino; Hirotada Akiho; Eikichi Ihara; Yoshihiro Ogawa
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Continued versus interrupted aspirin use and bleeding risk after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasms: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Veeravich Jaruvongvanich; Tomoki Sempokuya; Karn Wijarnpreecha; Patompong Ungprasert
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-15

10.  Asia-Pacific working group consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an update 2018.

Authors:  Joseph Jy Sung; Philip Wy Chiu; Francis K L Chan; James Yw Lau; Khean-Lee Goh; Lawrence Hy Ho; Hwoon-Young Jung; Jose D Sollano; Takuji Gotoda; Nageshwar Reddy; Rajvinder Singh; Kentaro Sugano; Kai-Chun Wu; Chun-Yin Wu; David J Bjorkman; Dennis M Jensen; Ernst J Kuipers; Angel Lanas
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.