Hania A Al-Hallaq1, Steven Chmura2, Joseph K Salama3, Kathryn A Winter4, Clifford G Robinson5, Thomas M Pisansky6, Virginia Borges7, Jessica R Lowenstein8, Susan McNulty9, James M Galvin9, David S Followill8, Robert D Timmerman10, Julia R White11, Ying Xiao12, Martha M Matuszak13. 1. Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: hal-hallaq@radonc.uchicago.edu. 2. Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 4. NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 7. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado. 8. Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Group (IROC) Houston, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 9. Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) Philadelphia RT, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 10. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern/Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas. 11. Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 12. Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) Philadelphia RT, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 13. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In 2014, the NRG Oncology Group initiated the first National Cancer Institute-sponsored, phase 1 clinical trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of multiple metastases in multiple organ sites (BR001; NCT02206334). The primary endpoint is to test the safety of SBRT for the treatment of 2 to 4 multiple lesions in several anatomic sites in a multi-institutional setting. Because of the technical challenges inherent to treating multiple lesions as their spatial separation decreases, we present the technical requirements for NRG-BR001 and the rationale for their selection. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with controlled primary tumors of breast, non-small cell lung, or prostate are eligible if they have 2 to 4 metastases distributed among 7 extracranial anatomic locations throughout the body. Prescription and organ-at-risk doses were determined by expert consensus. Credentialing requirements include (1) irradiation of the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core phantom with SBRT, (2) submitting image guided radiation therapy case studies, and (3) planning the benchmark. Guidelines for navigating challenging planning cases including assessing composite dose are discussed. RESULTS: Dosimetric planning to multiple lesions receiving differing doses (45-50 Gy) and fractionation (3-5) while irradiating the same organs at risk is discussed, particularly for metastases in close proximity (≤5 cm). The benchmark case was selected to demonstrate the planning tradeoffs required to satisfy protocol requirements for 2 nearby lesions. Examples of passing benchmark plans exhibited a large variability in plan conformity. DISCUSSION: NRG-BR001 was developed using expert consensus on multiple issues from the dose fractionation regimen to the minimum image guided radiation therapy guidelines. Credentialing was tied to the task rather than the anatomic site to reduce its burden. Every effort was made to include a variety of delivery methods to reflect current SBRT technology. Although some simplifications were adopted, the successful completion of this trial will inform future designs of both national and institutional trials and would allow immediate clinical adoption of SBRT trials for oligometastases.
INTRODUCTION: In 2014, the NRG Oncology Group initiated the first National Cancer Institute-sponsored, phase 1 clinical trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of multiple metastases in multiple organ sites (BR001; NCT02206334). The primary endpoint is to test the safety of SBRT for the treatment of 2 to 4 multiple lesions in several anatomic sites in a multi-institutional setting. Because of the technical challenges inherent to treating multiple lesions as their spatial separation decreases, we present the technical requirements for NRG-BR001 and the rationale for their selection. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with controlled primary tumors of breast, non-small cell lung, or prostate are eligible if they have 2 to 4 metastases distributed among 7 extracranial anatomic locations throughout the body. Prescription and organ-at-risk doses were determined by expert consensus. Credentialing requirements include (1) irradiation of the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core phantom with SBRT, (2) submitting image guided radiation therapy case studies, and (3) planning the benchmark. Guidelines for navigating challenging planning cases including assessing composite dose are discussed. RESULTS: Dosimetric planning to multiple lesions receiving differing doses (45-50 Gy) and fractionation (3-5) while irradiating the same organs at risk is discussed, particularly for metastases in close proximity (≤5 cm). The benchmark case was selected to demonstrate the planning tradeoffs required to satisfy protocol requirements for 2 nearby lesions. Examples of passing benchmark plans exhibited a large variability in plan conformity. DISCUSSION: NRG-BR001 was developed using expert consensus on multiple issues from the dose fractionation regimen to the minimum image guided radiation therapy guidelines. Credentialing was tied to the task rather than the anatomic site to reduce its burden. Every effort was made to include a variety of delivery methods to reflect current SBRT technology. Although some simplifications were adopted, the successful completion of this trial will inform future designs of both national and institutional trials and would allow immediate clinical adoption of SBRT trials for oligometastases.
Authors: Stephen L Lewis; Sandro Porceddu; Naoki Nakamura; David A Palma; Simon S Lo; Peter Hoskin; Drew Moghanaki; Steven J Chmura; Joseph K Salama Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Puneeth Iyengar; Brian D Kavanagh; Zabi Wardak; Irma Smith; Chul Ahn; David E Gerber; Jonathan Dowell; Randall Hughes; Ramzi Abdulrahman; D Ross Camidge; Laurie E Gaspar; Robert C Doebele; Paul A Bunn; Hak Choy; Robert Timmerman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-10-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Morten Hoyer; Henrik Roed; Anders Traberg Hansen; Lars Ohlhuis; Jorgen Petersen; Hanne Nellemann; Anne Kiil Berthelsen; Cai Grau; Svend Aage Engelholm; Hans Von der Maase Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2006 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: Kyle E Rusthoven; Brian D Kavanagh; Higinia Cardenes; Volker W Stieber; Stuart H Burri; Steven J Feigenberg; Mark A Chidel; Thomas J Pugh; Wilbur Franklin; Madeleine Kane; Laurie E Gaspar; Tracey E Schefter Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jason J Luke; Jeffrey M Lemons; Theodore G Karrison; Sean P Pitroda; James M Melotek; Yuanyuan Zha; Hania A Al-Hallaq; Ainhoa Arina; Nikolai N Khodarev; Linda Janisch; Paul Chang; Jyoti D Patel; Gini F Fleming; John Moroney; Manish R Sharma; Julia R White; Mark J Ratain; Thomas F Gajewski; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Steven J Chmura Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rohan R Katipally; Sean P Pitroda; Aditya Juloori; Steven J Chmura; Ralph R Weichselbaum Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 65.011
Authors: Anita M Werensteijn-Honingh; Petra S Kroon; Dennis Winkel; J Carlijn van Gaal; Jochem Hes; Louk M W Snoeren; Jaleesa K Timmer; Christiaan C P Mout; Gijsbert H Bol; Alexis N Kotte; Wietse S C Eppinga; Martijn Intven; Bas W Raaymakers; Ina M Jürgenliemk-Schulz Journal: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Date: 2022-06-30
Authors: Leonard Kim; Stephanie Markovina; Samantha J Van Nest; Subarna Eisaman; Lakshmi Santanam; Julie M Sullivan; Michael Dominello; Michael C Joiner; Jay Burmeister Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2019-05-25 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Ricardo Llorente; Benjamin O Spieler; James Victoria; Cristiane Takita; Raphael Yechieli; John C Ford; Karen Brown; Michael A Samuels; Eric A Mellon Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Lana Sanford Critchfield; Justin Visak; Mark E Bernard; Marcus E Randall; Ronald C McGarry; Damodar Pokhrel Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Julian C Hong; Diandra N Ayala-Peacock; Jason Lee; A William Blackstock; Paul Okunieff; Max W Sung; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Johnny Kao; James J Urbanic; Michael T Milano; Steven J Chmura; Joseph K Salama Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 3.240