Andrea Billè1, Usman Ahmad2, Kaitlin M Woo3, Kei Suzuki2, Prasad Adusumilli2, James Huang2, David R Jones2, Nabil Pierre Rizk2. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: andrea_bille@gstt.nhs.uk. 2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Wedge resection for selected patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer is considered to be a valid treatment option. The aim of this study was to evaluate the recurrence patterns after wedge resection, to analyze the survival of patients under routine follow-up, and to recommend a follow-up regimen. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was done of 446 consecutive patients between May 2000 and December 2012 who underwent a wedge resection for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. All patients were followed up with a computed tomography scan with or without contrast. The recurrence was recorded as local (involving the same lobe of wedge resection), regional (involving mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes or a different lobe), or distant (including distant metastasis and pleural disease). RESULTS: Median follow-up for survivors (n = 283) was 44.6 months. In all, 163 patients died; median overall survival was 82.6 months. Thirty-six patients were diagnosed with new primary non-small cell lung cancer, and 152 with recurrence (79 local, 45 regional, and 28 distant). There was no difference in the incidence of recurrence detection detected by computed tomography scans with versus without contrast (p = 0.18). The cumulative incidence of local recurrences at 1, 2, and 3 years was higher than the cumulative incidence for local, regional, and distant recurrences: 5.2%, 11.1%, and 14.9% versus 3.7%, 6.6%, and 9.5% versus 2.3%, 4.7%, and 6.4%, respectively. Primary tumor diameter was associated with local recurrence in univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Wedge resection for early stage non-small cell lung cancer is associated with a significant risk for local and regional recurrence. Long-term follow-up using noncontrast computed tomography scans at consistent intervals is appropriate to monitor for these recurrences.
BACKGROUND: Wedge resection for selected patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer is considered to be a valid treatment option. The aim of this study was to evaluate the recurrence patterns after wedge resection, to analyze the survival of patients under routine follow-up, and to recommend a follow-up regimen. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was done of 446 consecutive patients between May 2000 and December 2012 who underwent a wedge resection for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. All patients were followed up with a computed tomography scan with or without contrast. The recurrence was recorded as local (involving the same lobe of wedge resection), regional (involving mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes or a different lobe), or distant (including distant metastasis and pleural disease). RESULTS: Median follow-up for survivors (n = 283) was 44.6 months. In all, 163 patients died; median overall survival was 82.6 months. Thirty-six patients were diagnosed with new primary non-small cell lung cancer, and 152 with recurrence (79 local, 45 regional, and 28 distant). There was no difference in the incidence of recurrence detection detected by computed tomography scans with versus without contrast (p = 0.18). The cumulative incidence of local recurrences at 1, 2, and 3 years was higher than the cumulative incidence for local, regional, and distant recurrences: 5.2%, 11.1%, and 14.9% versus 3.7%, 6.6%, and 9.5% versus 2.3%, 4.7%, and 6.4%, respectively. Primary tumor diameter was associated with local recurrence in univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Wedge resection for early stage non-small cell lung cancer is associated with a significant risk for local and regional recurrence. Long-term follow-up using noncontrast computed tomography scans at consistent intervals is appropriate to monitor for these recurrences.
Authors: Hiroshi Sugimura; Francis C Nichols; Ping Yang; Mark S Allen; Stephen D Cassivi; Claude Deschamps; Brent A Williams; Peter C Pairolero Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Jessica Donington; Mark Ferguson; Peter Mazzone; John Handy; Matthew Schuchert; Hiran Fernando; Billy Loo; Michael Lanuti; Alberto de Hoyos; Frank Detterbeck; Arjun Pennathur; John Howington; Rodney Landreneau; Gerard Silvestri Journal: Chest Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: David S Ettinger; Wallace Akerley; Hossein Borghaei; Andrew C Chang; Richard T Cheney; Lucian R Chirieac; Thomas A D'Amico; Todd L Demmy; Apar Kishor P Ganti; Ramaswamy Govindan; Frederic W Grannis; Leora Horn; Thierry M Jahan; Mohammad Jahanzeb; Anne Kessinger; Ritsuko Komaki; Feng-Ming Kong; Mark G Kris; Lee M Krug; Inga T Lennes; Billy W Loo; Renato Martins; Janis O'Malley; Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Gregory A Otterson; Jyoti D Patel; Mary C Pinder-Schenck; Katherine M Pisters; Karen Reckamp; Gregory J Riely; Eric Rohren; Scott J Swanson; Douglas E Wood; Stephen C Yang; Miranda Hughes; Kristina M Gregory Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Francine L Jacobson; John H M Austin; John K Field; James R Jett; Shaf Keshavjee; Heber MacMahon; James L Mulshine; Reginald F Munden; Ravi Salgia; Gary M Strauss; David J Sugarbaker; Scott J Swanson; William D Travis; Michael T Jaklitsch Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Re-I Chin; Kevin Chen; Abul Usmani; Chanelle Chua; Peter K Harris; Michael S Binkley; Tej D Azad; Jonathan C Dudley; Aadel A Chaudhuri Journal: Mol Diagn Ther Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 4.074