Marcella Ottonello1, Leonardo Pellicciari, Andrea Giordano, Calogero Foti. 1. Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, Clinica del Lavoro e della Riabilitazione, Via Missolungi, 14, IT-16167 Nervi (GE), Italy. marcella.ottonello@fsm.it.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To perform a psychometric analysis of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) using Rasch analysis in a sample of Italian subjects with multiple sclerosis. METHODS: The 9-item FSS was administered to 156 Italian-speaking subjects with multiple sclerosis. Responses were assessed using Cronbach's alpha, item-remainder correlations, factor analysis and Rasch analysis. RESULTS: The FSS showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95), but presented problems in the rating categories and failed to fit the Rasch model. After re-coding and deletion of item 1 (infit mean-square (MnSq) = 1.65; outfit MnSq = 1.72), the 8-item version fitted the latent construct that the scale was intended to measure and showed satisfactory reliability indices. The scale was not optimally targeted to the sample, but no sex or age bias was found. CONCLUSION: The 8-item FSS shows better psychometric properties than the 9-item version. However, a significant ceiling effect emerged in our sample of Italian adults with multiple sclerosis and, consequently, there is a targeting problem for patients with low-level disability. To consider this a valid tool for use in clinical practice and research, further studies with a larger sample of subjects with multiple sclerosis are needed.
OBJECTIVE: To perform a psychometric analysis of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) using Rasch analysis in a sample of Italian subjects with multiple sclerosis. METHODS: The 9-item FSS was administered to 156 Italian-speaking subjects with multiple sclerosis. Responses were assessed using Cronbach's alpha, item-remainder correlations, factor analysis and Rasch analysis. RESULTS: The FSS showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95), but presented problems in the rating categories and failed to fit the Rasch model. After re-coding and deletion of item 1 (infit mean-square (MnSq) = 1.65; outfit MnSq = 1.72), the 8-item version fitted the latent construct that the scale was intended to measure and showed satisfactory reliability indices. The scale was not optimally targeted to the sample, but no sex or age bias was found. CONCLUSION: The 8-item FSS shows better psychometric properties than the 9-item version. However, a significant ceiling effect emerged in our sample of Italian adults with multiple sclerosis and, consequently, there is a targeting problem for patients with low-level disability. To consider this a valid tool for use in clinical practice and research, further studies with a larger sample of subjects with multiple sclerosis are needed.
Authors: D De Bartolo; G Morone; G Giordani; G Antonucci; V Russo; A Fusco; F Marinozzi; F Bini; G F Spitoni; S Paolucci; M Iosa Journal: Neurol Sci Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 3.307
Authors: Nadina B Lincoln; Lucy E Bradshaw; Cris S Constantinescu; Florence Day; Avril Er Drummond; Deborah Fitzsimmons; Shaun Harris; Alan A Montgomery; Roshan das Nair Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Anna Berardi; Giulia Graziosi; Gina Ferrazzano; Laura Casagrande Conti; Maria Grazia Grasso; Marco Tramontano; Antonella Conte; Giovanni Galeoto Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2022-05-25
Authors: Anna Knyszyńska; Aleksandra Radecka; Paulina Zabielska; Joanna Łuczak; Beata Karakiewicz; Anna Lubkowska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-18 Impact factor: 3.390