I Aktas1, C Nazikoglu2, A Kepez3, F U Ozkan1, M Y Kaysin1, P Akpinar1, Z Dogan4, C Ileri4, S Saymaz4, O Erdogan4. 1. Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Clinic, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. 2. Family Medicine Clinic, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. 3. Cardiology Clinic, Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey. alperkepez@yahoo.com. 4. Cardiology Clinic, Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
We evaluated the effects of zoledronic acid (ZA) therapy on electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters for the first time in the literature. Measurements were performed on ECGs obtained before and after ZA infusion on the same day as well as 1 month after the infusion. ZA infusion did not have any short- or long-term effect on any parameter that might be associated with the tendency for atrial fibrillation or ventricular arrhythmias. INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the early and late effects of ZA therapy on ECG parameters which might be associated with the tendency for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: Consecutive patients with osteoporosis who were admitted to our clinic between December 2013 and December 2014 and who were scheduled to receive ZA infusion constituted our study population. Twelve-lead surface ECGs were obtained from all patients before and after ZA infusion on the same day as well as 1 month after the infusion. All ECG parameters were measured and compared with each other for each patient. RESULTS: Data of 100 patients were used in the analysis (9 male; 70.5 ± 11.6 years of age). There were no significant differences between repeated measurements regarding pmax, pmin, and p dispersion values. QT max and QT min values were significantly increased after infusion; however, there were no significant changes in QT dispersion, Tp-e interval, and Tp-e dispersion values. CONCLUSIONS: ZA infusion did not affect P wave dispersion both at the immediate post-infusion period and 1 month after infusion. QT values were significantly increased early after ZA infusion; however, there were no significant differences in parameters reflecting disparity of ventricular recovery times and transmural dispersion of ventricular repolarization. Based on these observations, it may be suggested that ZA infusion did not have any short- or long-term effect on any parameter that might be associated with the tendency for atrial fibrillation or ventricular arrhythmias.
We evaluated the effects of zoledronic acid (ZA) therapy on electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters for the first time in the literature. Measurements were performed on ECGs obtained before and after ZA infusion on the same day as well as 1 month after the infusion. ZA infusion did not have any short- or long-term effect on any parameter that might be associated with the tendency for atrial fibrillation or ventricular arrhythmias. INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the early and late effects of ZA therapy on ECG parameters which might be associated with the tendency for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: Consecutive patients with osteoporosis who were admitted to our clinic between December 2013 and December 2014 and who were scheduled to receive ZA infusion constituted our study population. Twelve-lead surface ECGs were obtained from all patients before and after ZA infusion on the same day as well as 1 month after the infusion. All ECG parameters were measured and compared with each other for each patient. RESULTS: Data of 100 patients were used in the analysis (9 male; 70.5 ± 11.6 years of age). There were no significant differences between repeated measurements regarding pmax, pmin, and p dispersion values. QT max and QT min values were significantly increased after infusion; however, there were no significant changes in QT dispersion, Tp-e interval, and Tp-e dispersion values. CONCLUSIONS:ZA infusion did not affect P wave dispersion both at the immediate post-infusion period and 1 month after infusion. QT values were significantly increased early after ZA infusion; however, there were no significant differences in parameters reflecting disparity of ventricular recovery times and transmural dispersion of ventricular repolarization. Based on these observations, it may be suggested that ZA infusion did not have any short- or long-term effect on any parameter that might be associated with the tendency for atrial fibrillation or ventricular arrhythmias.
Authors: Ingrid M Bonilla; Pedro Vargas-Pinto; Yoshinori Nishijima; Adriana Pedraza-Toscano; Hsiang-Ting Ho; Victor P Long; Andriy E Belevych; Patric Glynn; Mahmoud Houmsse; Troy Rhodes; Raul Weiss; Thomas J Hund; Robert L Hamlin; Sandor Györke; Cynthia A Carnes Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2013-12-20
Authors: K Aytemir; N Ozer; E Atalar; E Sade; S Aksöyek; K Ovünç; A Oto; F Ozmen; S Kes Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Dennis M Black; Pierre D Delmas; Richard Eastell; Ian R Reid; Steven Boonen; Jane A Cauley; Felicia Cosman; Péter Lakatos; Ping Chung Leung; Zulema Man; Carlos Mautalen; Peter Mesenbrink; Huilin Hu; John Caminis; Karen Tong; Theresa Rosario-Jansen; Joel Krasnow; Trisha F Hue; Deborah Sellmeyer; Erik Fink Eriksen; Steven R Cummings Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-05-03 Impact factor: 91.245