Literature DB >> 27344585

Differential learning processes for laparoscopic and open supraumbilical pyloromyotomy.

Quentin Ballouhey1, Pauline Clermidi2, Alexia Roux2, Claire Bahans2, Roxane Compagnon2, Jérôme Cros2, Bernard Longis2, Laurent Fourcade2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the learning curves for mastering OP and LP surgical techniques, in terms of effects on completion times and postoperative outcomes/complications.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed for 198 patients with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. The learning curves were in regard to two groups of surgeons: three of whom performed 106 OPs while three others performed 92 LPs. Treatment-related complications were divided into two categories: specific complications relating to the pyloromyotomy and non-specific complications. A logistic regression model with repeated data was used to explore the occurrence of complications.
RESULTS: The overall postoperative complication rates were not significantly different between the OP (15.1 %) and the LP (11.8 %) groups. Specific complications were more frequent in the LP group (6.4 versus 2.8 %), while non-specific complications were more frequent in the OP group (12.1 versus 5.3 %). The occurrence of complications exhibited a statistically decreasing risk with each supplementary procedure that was performed (p = 0.0067) in the LP group, but not in the OP group (p = 0.9665).
CONCLUSION: From a learning process perspective, laparoscopy is mainly associated with a significantly higher risk of specific complications. This risk decreases in line with the surgeon's level of experience, whereas non-specific complications remain stable in open procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Learning curve; Pediatric; Pyloric stenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27344585     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-016-3920-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  18 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  E C Downey
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Surg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.754

2.  Risk of incomplete pyloromyotomy and mucosal perforation in open and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  Nigel J Hall; Simon Eaton; Aaron Seims; Charles M Leys; John C Densmore; Casey M Calkins; Daniel J Ostlie; Shawn D St Peter; Richard G Azizkhan; Daniel von Allmen; Jacob C Langer; Eveline Lapidus-Krol; Sarah Bouchard; Nelson Piché; Steven Bruch; Robert Drongowski; Gordon A MacKinlay; Claire Clark; Agostino Pierro
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  The umbilical fold approach to pyloromyotomy: is it a safe alternative to the right upper-quadrant approach?

Authors:  M J Leinwand; D B Shaul; K D Anderson
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Laparoscopic extramucosal pyloromyotomy versus open pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: which is better?

Authors:  T Fujimoto; G J Lane; O Segawa; S Esaki; T Miyano
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Shawn D St Peter; George W Holcomb; Casey M Calkins; J Patrick Murphy; Walter S Andrews; Ronald J Sharp; Charles L Snyder; Daniel J Ostlie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Experience with a nonlaparoscopic, transumbilical, intracavitary pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  Michael W L Gauderer
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Circumumbilical incision for pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  K C Tan; A Bianchi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marc-David Leclair; Valérie Plattner; Eric Mirallie; Corinne Lejus; Jean-Michel Nguyen; Guillaume Podevin; Yves Heloury
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Recovery after open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a double-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Nigel J Hall; Maurizio Pacilli; Simon Eaton; Kim Reblock; Barbara A Gaines; Aimee Pastor; Jacob C Langer; Antti I Koivusalo; Mikko P Pakarinen; Lutz Stroedter; Stefan Beyerlein; Munther Haddad; Simon Clarke; Henri Ford; Agostino Pierro
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-01-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on major complications.

Authors:  M W N Oomen; L T Hoekstra; R Bakx; D T Ubbink; H A Heij
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  2 in total

1.  Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a survey of 407 children.

Authors:  Aurélien Binet; C Klipfel; P Meignan; F Bastard; A R Cook; K Braïk; A Le Touze; T Villemagne; M Robert; Q Ballouhey; F Lengelle; S Amar; H Lardy
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Our Experience with Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy in Patients with Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis.

Authors:  Meltem Kaba; Cetin Ali Karadag; Mesut Demir; Nihat Sever; Aydin Unal; Melih Akin; Ali Ihsan Dokucu
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2020-09-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.