BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are recommended in patients with low ejection fraction. However, the survival benefit of ICDs in patients with end-stage heart failure listed for heart transplantation is unclear. AIM: To evaluate the ICD benefit on mortality in this population. METHODS: Three hundred and eighty consecutive patients listed for heart transplantation between 2005 and 2009 in one tertiary heart transplant centre were enrolled in a retrospective registry; 122 patients received an ICD before or within 3 months after being listed for heart transplantation (ICD group). Predictors of death on the waiting list were assessed by Cox regression. RESULTS: Overall, 15.6% of patients died while awaiting heart transplantation. Non-ICD patients presented more often haemodynamic compromise requiring mechanical circulatory support (29.1% vs. 9.8%; P<0.001), and were more likely to die while on the waiting list (19.0% vs. 8.3%; log-rank P=0.001). However, in the multivariable model, ICD did not remain an independent predictor of death. Need for mechanical circulatory support (P<0.001), low ejection fraction (P=0.001) and registration on the regular list (P=0.008) were the only independent predictors of death. Death was mainly caused by haemodynamic compromise (76.3% of deaths), which occurred more frequently in the non-ICD group (14.7% vs. 5.8%; log-rank P=0.002). Unknown/arrhythmic deaths did not differ significantly between the two groups (3.9% vs. 1.7%; log-rank P=0.21). ICD-related complications occurred in 21.4% of patients, mainly as a result of postoperative worsening of heart failure (11.9%). CONCLUSION: Haemodynamic failure appears as the main determinant of mortality in patients with end-stage heart failure awaiting heart transplantation. ICD seems to have little benefit on survival in this population.
BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are recommended in patients with low ejection fraction. However, the survival benefit of ICDs in patients with end-stage heart failure listed for heart transplantation is unclear. AIM: To evaluate the ICD benefit on mortality in this population. METHODS: Three hundred and eighty consecutive patients listed for heart transplantation between 2005 and 2009 in one tertiary heart transplant centre were enrolled in a retrospective registry; 122 patients received an ICD before or within 3 months after being listed for heart transplantation (ICD group). Predictors of death on the waiting list were assessed by Cox regression. RESULTS: Overall, 15.6% of patients died while awaiting heart transplantation. Non-ICDpatients presented more often haemodynamic compromise requiring mechanical circulatory support (29.1% vs. 9.8%; P<0.001), and were more likely to die while on the waiting list (19.0% vs. 8.3%; log-rank P=0.001). However, in the multivariable model, ICD did not remain an independent predictor of death. Need for mechanical circulatory support (P<0.001), low ejection fraction (P=0.001) and registration on the regular list (P=0.008) were the only independent predictors of death. Death was mainly caused by haemodynamic compromise (76.3% of deaths), which occurred more frequently in the non-ICD group (14.7% vs. 5.8%; log-rank P=0.002). Unknown/arrhythmic deaths did not differ significantly between the two groups (3.9% vs. 1.7%; log-rank P=0.21). ICD-related complications occurred in 21.4% of patients, mainly as a result of postoperative worsening of heart failure (11.9%). CONCLUSION:Haemodynamic failure appears as the main determinant of mortality in patients with end-stage heart failure awaiting heart transplantation. ICD seems to have little benefit on survival in this population.
Authors: Andrew Y Lin; Jason M Duran; Alexandra Sykes; Douglas Darden; Marcus Urey; Jonathan C Hsu; Eric D Adler; Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green Journal: Heart Rhythm O2 Date: 2021-12-17