Yohei Arai1, Eiichiro Kanda2,3, Soichiro Iimori1, Shotaro Naito1, Yumi Noda4, Tomoki Kawasaki5, Hidehiko Sato1, Ryoichi Ando6, Sei Sasaki1, Eisei Sohara1, Tomokazu Okado1, Tatemitsu Rai1, Shinichi Uchida1. 1. Department of Nephrology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Department of Nephrology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. tokyo.kyosai.kanda@gmail.com. 3. Department of Nephrology, Tokyo Kyosai Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. tokyo.kyosai.kanda@gmail.com. 4. Department of Nephrology, Nitobe Memorial Nakano General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 5. Department of Nephrology, Tokyo Metropolitan Ohtsuka Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 6. Department of Nephrology, Japanese Red Cross Musashino Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vitamin D analogs have generally been recommended for treatment of mineral bone disease in chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the association between this treatment and CKD progression has not yet been established. METHODS: We designed a post hoc propensity score-matched cohort analysis derived from 3-year follow-up data of a prospective cohort. Adult participants with pre-dialysis CKD stages 4-5 who had newly been prescribed active vitamin D analogs during the observation period were eligible as matched cases. Then, matched controls were extracted from participants who had never been prescribed active vitamin D analogs. The primary outcome was a composite of end-stage renal disease or a 50 % reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). A Cox proportional hazards model evaluated the association between the use of vitamin D analogs and the primary outcome. RESULTS: We enrolled 240 patients (males, 65 %). The number of matched cases and controls was 30 and 210, respectively. The primary outcome was observed in 94 patients, whereas 25 patients died. The mean ± standard deviation age and eGFR were 69 ± 12 years and 17 ± 5.7 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively. In a Cox proportional hazard model, the use of vitamin D analogs was independently associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome (crude hazard ratio 0.41; 95 % confidence interval 0.19, 0.89; adjusted hazard ratio 0.38; 95 % confidence interval 0.17, 0.88). CONCLUSION: The use of vitamin D analogs is independently associated with the preservation of renal function in patients with pre-dialysis CKD stages 4-5.
BACKGROUND:Vitamin D analogs have generally been recommended for treatment of mineral bone disease in chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the association between this treatment and CKD progression has not yet been established. METHODS: We designed a post hoc propensity score-matched cohort analysis derived from 3-year follow-up data of a prospective cohort. Adult participants with pre-dialysis CKD stages 4-5 who had newly been prescribed active vitamin D analogs during the observation period were eligible as matched cases. Then, matched controls were extracted from participants who had never been prescribed active vitamin D analogs. The primary outcome was a composite of end-stage renal disease or a 50 % reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). A Cox proportional hazards model evaluated the association between the use of vitamin D analogs and the primary outcome. RESULTS: We enrolled 240 patients (males, 65 %). The number of matched cases and controls was 30 and 210, respectively. The primary outcome was observed in 94 patients, whereas 25 patients died. The mean ± standard deviation age and eGFR were 69 ± 12 years and 17 ± 5.7 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively. In a Cox proportional hazard model, the use of vitamin D analogs was independently associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome (crude hazard ratio 0.41; 95 % confidence interval 0.19, 0.89; adjusted hazard ratio 0.38; 95 % confidence interval 0.17, 0.88). CONCLUSION: The use of vitamin D analogs is independently associated with the preservation of renal function in patients with pre-dialysis CKD stages 4-5.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chronic kidney disease; End-stage renal disease; Mineral bone disease; Vitamin D
Authors: Pooneh Alborzi; Nina A Patel; Carla Peterson; Jennifer E Bills; Dagim M Bekele; Zerihun Bunaye; Robert P Light; Rajiv Agarwal Journal: Hypertension Date: 2008-07-07 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Weihua Yuan; Wei Pan; Juan Kong; Wei Zheng; Frances L Szeto; Kari E Wong; Ronald Cohen; Anna Klopot; Zhongyi Zhang; Yan Chun Li Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2007-08-09 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: N A Hamdy; J A Kanis; M N Beneton; C B Brown; J R Juttmann; J G Jordans; S Josse; A Meyrier; R L Lins; I T Fairey Journal: BMJ Date: 1995-02-11