Literature DB >> 27344105

Learning clinically useful information from images: Past, present and future.

Daniel Rueckert1, Ben Glocker2, Bernhard Kainz2.   

Abstract

Over the last decade, research in medical imaging has made significant progress in addressing challenging tasks such as image registration and image segmentation. In particular, the use of model-based approaches has been key in numerous, successful advances in methodology. The advantage of model-based approaches is that they allow the incorporation of prior knowledge acting as a regularisation that favours plausible solutions over implausible ones. More recently, medical imaging has moved away from hand-crafted, and often explicitly designed models towards data-driven, implicit models that are constructed using machine learning techniques. This has led to major improvements in all stages of the medical imaging pipeline, from acquisition and reconstruction to analysis and interpretation. As more and more imaging data is becoming available, e.g., from large population studies, this trend is likely to continue and accelerate. At the same time new developments in machine learning, e.g., deep learning, as well as significant improvements in computing power, e.g., parallelisation on graphics hardware, offer new potential for data-driven, semantic and intelligent medical imaging. This article outlines the work of the BioMedIA group in this area and highlights some of the challenges and opportunities for future work.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Intelligent imaging; Machine learning; Semantic imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27344105     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2016.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current Applications and Future Impact of Machine Learning in Radiology.

Authors:  Garry Choy; Omid Khalilzadeh; Mark Michalski; Synho Do; Anthony E Samir; Oleg S Pianykh; J Raymond Geis; Pari V Pandharipande; James A Brink; Keith J Dreyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Fully-automated left ventricular mass and volume MRI analysis in the UK Biobank population cohort: evaluation of initial results.

Authors:  Avan Suinesiaputra; Mihir M Sanghvi; Nay Aung; Jose Miguel Paiva; Filip Zemrak; Kenneth Fung; Elena Lukaschuk; Aaron M Lee; Valentina Carapella; Young Jin Kim; Jane Francis; Stefan K Piechnik; Stefan Neubauer; Andreas Greiser; Marie-Pierre Jolly; Carmel Hayes; Alistair A Young; Steffen E Petersen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Automatic 3D Bi-Ventricular Segmentation of Cardiac Images by a Shape-Refined Multi- Task Deep Learning Approach.

Authors:  Jinming Duan; Ghalib Bello; Jo Schlemper; Wenjia Bai; Timothy J W Dawes; Carlo Biffi; Antonio de Marvao; Georgia Doumoud; Declan P O'Regan; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Imaging of the pial arterial vasculature of the human brain in vivo using high-resolution 7T time-of-flight angiography.

Authors:  Saskia Bollmann; Hendrik Mattern; Michaël Bernier; Simon D Robinson; Daniel Park; Oliver Speck; Jonathan R Polimeni
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  Apparent diffusion coefficient of vertebral haemangiomas allows differentiation from malignant focal deposits in whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Jessica M Winfield; Gabriele Poillucci; Matthew D Blackledge; David J Collins; Vallari Shah; Nina Tunariu; Martin F Kaiser; Christina Messiou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.