Literature DB >> 27343565

Inferior gluteal and other nerves associated with sacrospinous ligament: a cadaver study.

Maria E Florian-Rodriguez1, Adam Hare2, Kathryn Chin3, John N Phelan4, Christopher M Ripperda2, Marlene M Corton2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reported rates of gluteal pain after sacrospinous ligament fixation range from 12-55% in the immediate postoperative period and from 4-15% 4-6 weeks postoperatively. The source of gluteal pain often is attributed to injury to the nerve to levator ani or pudendal nerve. The inferior gluteal nerve and other sacral nerve branches have not been examined thoroughly as potential sources of gluteal pain.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to further characterize anatomy of the inferior gluteal nerve and other nerves that are associated with the sacrospinous ligament from a combined gluteal and pelvic approach and to correlate findings to sacrospinous ligament fixation. STUDY
DESIGN: Dissections were performed in female cadavers that had not been embalmed with gluteal and pelvic approaches. From a pelvic perspective, the closest structure to the superior border of the sacrospinous ligament midpoint was noted, and the sacral nerves that perforated the ventral surface of coccygeus muscle were examined. From a gluteal perspective, the closest distances from ischial spine to the pudendal, inferior gluteal, posterior femoral cutaneous, and sciatic nerves were measured. In addition, the closest distance from the midpoint of sacrospinous ligament to the inferior gluteal nerve and the origin of this nerve were documented. The thickness and height of the sacrospinous ligament at its midpoint were measured. Sacral nerve branches that coursed between the sacrospinous and sacrotuberous ligaments were assessed from both a pelvic and a gluteal approach. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.
RESULTS: Fourteen cadavers were examined. From a pelvic perspective, the closest structure to the superior border of sacrospinous ligament at its midpoint was the S3 nerve (median distance, 3 mm; range, 0-11 mm). Branches from S3 and/or S4 perforated the ventral surface of coccygeus muscles in 94% specimens. From a gluteal perspective, the closest structure to ischial spine was the pudendal nerve (median distance, 0 mm; range, 0-9 mm). Median closest distance from inferior gluteal nerve to ischial spine and to the midpoint of sacrospinous ligament was 28.5 mm (range, 6-53 mm) and 31.5 mm (range, 10-47 mm), respectively. The inferior gluteal nerve arose from dorsal surface of combined lumbosacral trunk and S1 nerves in all specimens; a contribution from S2 was noted in 46% of hemipelvises. At its midpoint, the sacrospinous ligament median thickness was 5 mm (range, 2-7 mm), and its median height was 14 mm (range, 3-22 mm). In 85% of specimens, 1 to 3 branches from S3 and/or S4 nerves pierced or coursed ventral to the sacrotuberous ligament and perforated the inferior portion of the gluteus maximus muscle.
CONCLUSIONS: Damage to the inferior gluteal nerve during sacrospinous ligament fixation is an unlikely source for postoperative gluteal pain. Rather, branches from S3 and/or S4 that innervate the coccygeus muscles and those coursing between the sacrospinous and sacrotuberous ligaments to supply gluteus maximus muscles are more likely to be implicated. A thorough understanding of the complex anatomy surrounding the sacrospinous ligament, limiting depth of needle penetration into the ligament, and avoiding extension of needle exit or entry point above the upper extent of sacrospinous ligament may reduce nerve entrapment and postoperative gluteal pain.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gluteal pain; inferior gluteal nerve; injury; sacrospinous ligament; sacrospinous ligament fixation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27343565     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  Vaginal hysterectomy with apical fixation and anterior vaginal wall repair for prolapse: surgical technique and medium-term results.

Authors:  Juliane Marschke; Carlo Michael Pax; Kathrin Beilecke; Frank Schwab; Ralf Tunn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Prolapse Repair Using Non-synthetic Material: What is the Current Standard?

Authors:  Ricardo Palmerola; Nirit Rosenblum
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Function, quality-of-life and complications after sacrospinous ligament fixation using an antegrade reusable suturing device (ARSD-Ney) at 6 and 12 months: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ping Wang; Mingyue Li; Huating Sun; Liping Ni; Honghong Cai; Wen Fan; Jinhua Zhou; Juan Wang; Hongmei Ding; Youguo Chen; Fangrong Shen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-05

5.  Surgical management of pudendal nerve entrapment after sacrospinous ligament fixation.

Authors:  Eva V Vodegel; Kim W M van Delft; Charlotte H C Nuboer; Claudia R Kowalik; Jan-Paul W R Roovers
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 7.331

6.  Pelvic orthosis effects on posterior pelvis kinematics An in-vitro biomechanical study.

Authors:  Stefan Klima; Ronny Grunert; Benjamin Ondruschka; Mario Scholze; Thomas Seidel; Michael Werner; Niels Hammer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.