Sonya Gabrielian1, Anita H Yuan2, Ronald M Andersen3, Lillian Gelberg3. 1. VA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA sonya.gabrielian@va.gov. 2. VA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. VA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Little is known about how permanent supported housing influences ambulatory care received by homeless persons. To fill this gap, we compared diagnoses treated in VA Greater Los Angeles (VAGLA) ambulatory care between Veterans who are formerly homeless-now housed/case managed through VA Supported Housing ("VASH Veterans")-and currently homeless. METHODS: We performed secondary database analyses of homeless-experienced Veterans (n = 3631) with VAGLA ambulatory care use from October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011. We compared diagnoses treated-adjusting for demographics and need characteristics in regression analyses-between VASH Veterans (n = 1904) and currently homeless Veterans (n = 1727). RESULTS: On average, considering 26 studied diagnoses, VASH (vs currently homeless) Veterans received care for more (P < .05) diagnoses (mean = 2.9/1.7). Adjusting for demographics and need characteristics, VASH Veterans were more likely (P < .05) than currently homeless Veterans to receive treatment for diagnoses across categories: chronic physical illness, acute physical illness, mental illness, and substance use disorders. Specifically, VASH Veterans had 2.5, 1.7, 2.1, and 1.8 times greater odds of receiving treatment for at least 2 condition in these categories, respectively. Among participants treated for chronic illnesses, adjusting for predisposing and need characteristics, VASH (vs currently homeless) Veterans were 9%, 8%, and 11% more likely to have 2 or more visits for chronic physical illnesses, mental illnesses, and substance use disorder, respectively. CONCLUSION: Among homeless-experienced Veterans, permanent supported housing may reduce disparities in the treatment of diagnoses commonly seen in ambulatory care.
PURPOSE: Little is known about how permanent supported housing influences ambulatory care received by homeless persons. To fill this gap, we compared diagnoses treated in VA Greater Los Angeles (VAGLA) ambulatory care between Veterans who are formerly homeless-now housed/case managed through VA Supported Housing ("VASH Veterans")-and currently homeless. METHODS: We performed secondary database analyses of homeless-experienced Veterans (n = 3631) with VAGLA ambulatory care use from October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011. We compared diagnoses treated-adjusting for demographics and need characteristics in regression analyses-between VASH Veterans (n = 1904) and currently homeless Veterans (n = 1727). RESULTS: On average, considering 26 studied diagnoses, VASH (vs currently homeless) Veterans received care for more (P < .05) diagnoses (mean = 2.9/1.7). Adjusting for demographics and need characteristics, VASH Veterans were more likely (P < .05) than currently homeless Veterans to receive treatment for diagnoses across categories: chronic physical illness, acute physical illness, mental illness, and substance use disorders. Specifically, VASH Veterans had 2.5, 1.7, 2.1, and 1.8 times greater odds of receiving treatment for at least 2 condition in these categories, respectively. Among participants treated for chronic illnesses, adjusting for predisposing and need characteristics, VASH (vs currently homeless) Veterans were 9%, 8%, and 11% more likely to have 2 or more visits for chronic physical illnesses, mental illnesses, and substance use disorder, respectively. CONCLUSION: Among homeless-experienced Veterans, permanent supported housing may reduce disparities in the treatment of diagnoses commonly seen in ambulatory care.
Authors: Thomas P O'Toole; Lauren Buckel; Claire Bourgault; Jonathan Blumen; Stephen G Redihan; Lan Jiang; Peter Friedmann Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-10-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Amy K Rosen; Susan A Loveland; Jennifer J Anderson; Cheryl S Hankin; James N Breckenridge; Dan R Berlowitz Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Stefan G Kertesz; Kimberly Crouch; Jesse B Milby; Robert E Cusimano; Joseph E Schumacher Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis; Rebecca Ganann; Shari Krishnaratne; Donna Ciliska; Fiona Kouyoumdjian; Stephen W Hwang Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Stephen W Hwang; Emma Wilkins; Catharine Chambers; Eileen Estrabillo; Jon Berends; Anna MacDonald Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2011-07-08 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Sonya Gabrielian; Elizabeth Bromley; Alison B Hamilton; Van T Vu; Adrian Alexandrino; Ella Koosis; Alexander S Young Journal: Am J Orthopsychiatry Date: 2018-07-16
Authors: Sonya Gabrielian; Alison B Hamilton; Lillian Gelberg; Gerhard Hellemann; Ella R Koosis; Axeline Johnson; Alexander S Young Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2019-03-09
Authors: Yinan Peng; Robert A Hahn; Ramona K C Finnie; Jamaicia Cobb; Samantha P Williams; Jonathan E Fielding; Robert L Johnson; Ann Elizabeth Montgomery; Alex F Schwartz; Carles Muntaner; Veronica Helms Garrison; Beda Jean-Francois; Benedict I Truman; Mindy T Fullilove Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2020 Sep/Oct