Literature DB >> 27342789

The Prevalence of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization in the United States: Analysis of the IRIS(®) Data Registry and NHANES.

Jeffrey R Willis1, Susan Vitale2, Lawrence Morse3, David W Parke4, William L Rich4, Flora Lum5, Ronald A Cantrell6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of high myopia (HM), progressive high (degenerative) myopia (PHM), and myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) in the United States.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 18 years and older participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and patients aged 18 years and older seen in clinics participating in the American Academy of Ophthalmology's Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS(®)) Registry.
METHODS: We analyzed NHANES data from 2005 to 2008 to determine the prevalence of HM in the United States. This prevalence was then applied to estimates from the US Population Census (2014) to arrive at a population burden of HM at the diopter level in the United States. Data from the IRIS Registry were used to calculate the real-world prevalence rates of PHM and mCNV among patients with HM at the diopter level. This was subsequently applied to this reference population with HM to calculate the diopter-adjusted prevalence and population burden of PHM and mCNV in the United States in 2014. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: High myopia was defined as myopic refractive error of ≤6.0 diopters in the right eye. Progressive HM was defined as HM with the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code of "360.21: Progressive High (Degenerative) Myopia." Myopic CNV was defined as HM with the presence of subretinal/choroidal neovascularization indicated by the ICD-9-CM diagnosis of "362.16: Retinal Neovascularization NOS."
RESULTS: The estimated diopter-adjusted prevalence of HM, PHM, and mCNV was 3.92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.82-5.60), 0.33% (95% CI, 0.21-0.55), and 0.017% (95% CI, 0.010-0.030), respectively, among adults in the United States aged 18 years and older in 2014. This translated into a population burden of approximately 9 614 719 adults with HM, 817 829 adults with PHM, and 41 111 adults with mCNV in the United States in 2014.
CONCLUSIONS: Although HM and PHM impose a relatively large burden among adults in the United States, mCNV seems to be a rare disease. Relating data from the IRIS Registry and NHANES could be a novel method for assessing ophthalmic disease prevalence in the United States. Future studies should aim to better assess current treatment patterns and optimal management strategies of this condition.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27342789     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  12 in total

1.  Quantifying the Impact of Trainee Providers on Outpatient Clinic Workflow using Secondary EHR Data.

Authors:  Isaac H Goldstein; Michelle R Hribar; Read-Brown Sarah; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

2.  Lamellar macular holes in the eyes with pathological myopia.

Authors:  Roberto dell'Omo; Gianni Virgili; Ferdinando Bottoni; Barbara Parolini; Serena De Turris; Attilo Di Salvatore; Ermanno dell'Omo; Ciro Costagliola
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  [Secondary diseases in high myopia].

Authors:  F Ziemssen; W Lagrèze; B Voykov
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  Pathologic myopia: an overview of the current understanding and interventions.

Authors:  Takashi Ueta; So Makino; Yuuka Yamamoto; Harumi Fukushima; Shigeko Yashiro; Miyuki Nagahara
Journal:  Glob Health Med       Date:  2020-06-30

5.  Pseudophakic adult with progressive optic disc tilt and axial length elongation.

Authors:  Ryan T Yanagihara; Priscilla Nobrega; Philip P Chen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2020-07-02

6.  A novel classification of high myopia into anterior and posterior pathologic subtypes.

Authors:  Cassie A Ludwig; Ryan A Shields; Tiffany A Chen; Matthew A Powers; D Wilkin Parke; Andrew A Moshfeghi; Darius M Moshfeghi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Inheritance of Refractive Error in Millennials.

Authors:  Dibyendu Pusti; Antonio Benito; Juan J Madrid-Valero; Juan R Ordoñana; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Prevalence and Possible Factors of Myopia in Norwegian Adolescents.

Authors:  Lene A Hagen; Jon V B Gjelle; Solveig Arnegard; Hilde R Pedersen; Stuart J Gilson; Rigmor C Baraas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Unintentional Retinal Displacement in Eyes Treated for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Complicated by Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy with Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Silicone Oil.

Authors:  Mariaelena Filippelli; Pasquale Napolitano; Ciro Costagliola; Michele Rinaldi; Flavia Chiosi; Roberto dell'Omo
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 10.  Treatment Landscape of Macular Disorders in Indian Patients with the Advent of Razumab™ (World's First Biosimilar Ranibizumab): A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Shashikant Sharma; Tanishq Sharma; Somdutt Prasad; Mahesh Gopalakrishnan; Alok Chaturvedi
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2021-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.