Literature DB >> 27342237

The e-MSWS-12: improving the multiple sclerosis walking scale using item response theory.

Matthew M Engelhard1, Karen M Schmidt2, Casey E Engel3, J Nicholas Brenton4, Stephen D Patek5, Myla D Goldman4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) is the predominant patient-reported measure of multiple sclerosis (MS) -elated walking ability, yet it had not been analyzed using item response theory (IRT), the emerging standard for patient-reported outcome (PRO) validation. This study aims to reduce MSWS-12 measurement error and facilitate computerized adaptive testing by creating an IRT model of the MSWS-12 and distributing it online.
METHODS: MSWS-12 responses from 284 subjects with MS were collected by mail and used to fit and compare several IRT models. Following model selection and assessment, subpopulations based on age and sex were tested for differential item functioning (DIF).
RESULTS: Model comparison favored a one-dimensional graded response model (GRM). This model met fit criteria and explained 87 % of response variance. The performance of each MSWS-12 item was characterized using category response curves (CRCs) and item information. IRT-based MSWS-12 scores correlated with traditional MSWS-12 scores (r = 0.99) and timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) speed (r =  -0.70). Item 2 showed DIF based on age (χ 2 = 19.02, df = 5, p < 0.01), and Item 11 showed DIF based on sex (χ 2 = 13.76, df = 5, p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: MSWS-12 measurement error depends on walking ability, but could be lowered by improving or replacing items with low information or DIF. The e-MSWS-12 includes IRT-based scoring, error checking, and an estimated T25FW derived from MSWS-12 responses. It is available at https://ms-irt.shinyapps.io/e-MSWS-12 .

Entities:  

Keywords:  12-Item multiple sclerosis walking scale; Differential item functioning; Graded response model; Item response theory; Multiple sclerosis; Timed 25-foot walk

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27342237     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-016-1342-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  19 in total

1.  Confirming the validity and responsiveness of the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12).

Authors:  C McGuigan; M Hutchinson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  Item response theory and its applications to patient-reported outcomes measurement.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Chang; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Utilizing Rasch measurement models to develop a computer adaptive self-report of walking, climbing, and running.

Authors:  Craig A Velozo; Ying Wang; Leigh Lehman; Jia-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 4.  The psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures of walking and mobility in neurological conditions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Tyson; Louise Connell
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 3.477

5.  Validity of minimal clinically important difference values for the multiple sclerosis walking scale-12?

Authors:  Robert W Motl; Yvonne C Learmonth; Lara A Pilutti; Deirdre Dlugonski; Rachel Klaren
Journal:  Eur Neurol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 1.710

Review 6.  Timed 25-foot walk: direct evidence that improving 20% or greater is clinically meaningful in MS.

Authors:  Jeremy Hobart; Andrew R Blight; Andrew Goodman; Frances Lynn; Norman Putzki
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Confirmation and extension of the validity of the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12).

Authors:  Robert W Motl; Erin M Snook
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.181

8.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years.

Authors:  David Cella; Susan Yount; Nan Rothrock; Richard Gershon; Karon Cook; Bryce Reeve; Deborah Ader; James F Fries; Bonnie Bruce; Mattias Rose
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria.

Authors:  Chris H Polman; Stephen C Reingold; Brenda Banwell; Michel Clanet; Jeffrey A Cohen; Massimo Filippi; Kazuo Fujihara; Eva Havrdova; Michael Hutchinson; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Xavier Montalban; Paul O'Connor; Magnhild Sandberg-Wollheim; Alan J Thompson; Emmanuelle Waubant; Brian Weinshenker; Jerry S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  A Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Short-Form Quality of Life Questionnaire Developed and Validated for Multiple Sclerosis: The MusiQoL-MCAT.

Authors:  Pierre Michel; Karine Baumstarck; Badih Ghattas; Jean Pelletier; Anderson Loundou; Mohamed Boucekine; Pascal Auquier; Laurent Boyer
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  3 in total

1.  Identifying Unbiased Items for Screening Preschoolers for Disruptive Behavior Problems.

Authors:  Christina R Studts; Jodi Polaha; Michiel A van Zyl
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2017-05-01

2.  Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test Is Less Responsive Than Legacy Hip-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Authors:  Blake M Bodendorfer; Ian M Clapp; Robert B Browning; Thomas D Alter; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-27

3.  Preoperative Performance of the PROMIS in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Authors:  Benedict U Nwachukwu; Edward C Beck; Reagan Chapman; Jorge Chahla; Kelechi Okoroha; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-07-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.