Literature DB >> 27341955

Evaluation of Dose-Reduced Direct Oral Anticoagulant Therapy.

Megan E Barra1, John Fanikos1, Jean M Connors2, Katelyn W Sylvester1, Gregory Piazza3, Samuel Z Goldhaber4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Compared with vitamin K antagonists, direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have fixed dosing, limited drug interactions, and do not require therapeutic drug level monitoring. Dose adjustments are recommended for moderate renal dysfunction, low body weight, and select drug interactions.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study is to determine if DOAC dose reductions were appropriate based on the manufacturer labeling recommendations for each agent. We also followed patients' treatment outcomes.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients administered a DOAC at a reduced dose between January 2011 and August 2014. The primary outcome was adherence to current manufacturer dose recommendations. The secondary outcome measures were the incidence of thromboembolic events or any bleeding episodes, regardless of severity, while on therapy.
RESULTS: Of 224 patients included in the analysis, 43.3% of patients fit criteria for a dose adjustment according to manufacturer recommendations. Only 3 of 28 (10.7%) patients treated with apixaban met 2 out of 3 clinical criteria required for a dose reduction per manufacturer recommendations. Only 54.7% of rivaroxaban-treated patients and 32.2% of dabigatran-treated patients had renal insufficiency requiring a dose reduction. Half of our patient population received aspirin therapy, with 6.3% of patients on triple antithrombotic therapy (dual antiplatelet agents plus an anticoagulant). A past medical history significant for bleeding was prevalent in patients treated with a reduced-dose DOAC (32.1%, 20.4%, and 25.4% of patients in the apixaban-, rivaroxaban-, and dabigatran-treated groups, respectively). Thromboembolic events occurred in 10.7%, 3.6%, and 5.1% of patients in the apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran groups, respectively. Frequency of bleeding complications, regardless of severity, was 17.9%, 18.2%, and 23.7% of patients in the apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran groups, respectively.
CONCLUSION: We found that dose-adjusted DOAC therapy was often prescribed in a dose that was lower than package insert recommendations.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticoagulation; Atrial fibrillation; Dose reduction; Drug interactions; Renal dysfunction; Venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27341955     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.05.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  41 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapies Focus: Are low doses of direct-acting oral anticoagulants justified and appropriate in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?

Authors:  Antoni Martínez-Rubio; Gheorghe-Andrei Dan
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2016-12

Review 2.  Expanding anticoagulation management services to include direct oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Katelyn W Sylvester; Clara Ting; Andrea Lewin; Peter Collins; John Fanikos; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Jean M Connors
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulant dosing for venous thromboembolism treatment.

Authors:  Emmeline Tran; Ashley Duckett; Sarah Fisher; Nicole Bohm
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Factor XI(a) inhibitors for thrombosis: an updated patent review (2016-present).

Authors:  Rami A Al-Horani
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Pat       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 6.674

Review 5.  Impact of direct oral anticoagulant off-label doses on clinical outcomes of atrial fibrillation patients: A systematic review.

Authors:  Joana Santos; Natália António; Marília Rocha; Ana Fortuna
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Initial apixaban dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Alexander Buchholz; Laura Ueberham; Kaja Gorczynska; Borislav Dinov; Sebastian Hilbert; Nikolaos Dagres; Daniela Husser; Gerhard Hindricks; Andreas Bollmann
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 7.  Direct oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: treatment outcomes and dosing in special populations.

Authors:  Zachary A Stacy; Sara K Richter
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2018-09

8.  Quality of direct oral anticoagulant prescribing in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: results from a large urban health system.

Authors:  Shakira J Grant; Shawn Kothari; Phyllis A Gimotty; Nalaka S Gooneratne; Adam Cuker
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Non-recommended dosing of direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism is related to an increased rate of adverse events.

Authors:  Romain Chopard; Guillaume Serzian; Sébastien Humbert; Nicolas Falvo; Mathilde Morel-Aleton; Benjamin Bonnet; Gabriel Napporn; Elsa Kalbacher; Laurent Obert; Bruno Degano; Gilles Cappelier; Yves Cottin; François Schiele; Nicolas Meneveau
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 10.  Combining oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies: appropriate patient selection.

Authors:  Jeremy W Vandiver; K Diane Beavers
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.