Jason Craig1, Courtney Hilderman, Geoffrey Wilson, Robyn Misovic. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, Queen Alexandra Centre for Children's Health, Island Health, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada (Mr Craig, Ms Misovic, and Mr Wilson); and Department of Physical Therapy, BC Centre for Ability, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (Ms Hilderman).
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether casting, orthoses, stretching, or supported standing programs are effective in improving or maintaining body functions and structures, activity, or participation in children with neuromuscular disabilities. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using 6 electronic databases to identify Level 1 and 2 studies investigating stretch interventions for children aged 0 to 19 years with neuromuscular disabilities. Interventions were coded using the International Classification of Function and rated with Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation, the Oxford Levels of Evidence, and the Evidence Alert Traffic Light System. RESULTS: Sixteen studies evaluated the effectiveness of stretch interventions. Low-grade evidence supports casting temporarily increasing ankle range of motion, orthoses improving gait parameters while they are worn, and supported standing programs improving bone mineral density. CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence suggesting stretch interventions benefit body functions and structures. There is inconclusive evidence to support or refute stretching interventions for preventing contractures or impacting a child's activity or participation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospero CRD42014013807.
PURPOSE: To determine whether casting, orthoses, stretching, or supported standing programs are effective in improving or maintaining body functions and structures, activity, or participation in children with neuromuscular disabilities. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using 6 electronic databases to identify Level 1 and 2 studies investigating stretch interventions for children aged 0 to 19 years with neuromuscular disabilities. Interventions were coded using the International Classification of Function and rated with Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation, the Oxford Levels of Evidence, and the Evidence Alert Traffic Light System. RESULTS: Sixteen studies evaluated the effectiveness of stretch interventions. Low-grade evidence supports casting temporarily increasing ankle range of motion, orthoses improving gait parameters while they are worn, and supported standing programs improving bone mineral density. CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence suggesting stretch interventions benefit body functions and structures. There is inconclusive evidence to support or refute stretching interventions for preventing contractures or impacting a child's activity or participation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospero CRD42014013807.
Authors: Glen H Nuckolls; Kathi Kinnett; Sudarshan Dayanidhi; Andrea A Domenighetti; Tina Duong; Yetrib Hathout; Michael W Lawlor; Sabrina S M Lee; S Peter Magnusson; Craig M McDonald; Elizabeth M McNally; Natalie F Miller; Bradley B Olwin; Preeti Raghavan; Thomas J Roberts; Seward B Rutkove; John F Sarwark; Claudia R Senesac; Leslie F Vogel; Glenn A Walter; Rebecca J Willcocks; William Z Rymer; Richard L Lieber Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2020-03-07 Impact factor: 3.852