Literature DB >> 27341527

Analysis of the effects of microbiome-related confounding factors on the reproducibility of the volatolomic test.

Marcis Leja1, Haitham Amal, Ieva Lasina, Roberts Skapars, Armands Sivins, Guntis Ancans, Ivars Tolmanis, Aigars Vanags, Juozas Kupcinskas, Rima Ramonaite, Salam Khatib, Shifaa Bdarneh, Rasha Natour, Areen Ashkar, Hossam Haick.   

Abstract

Volatile organic compound (VOC) testing in breath has potential in gastric cancer (GC) detection. Our objective was to assess the reproducibility of VOCs in GC, and the effects of conditions modifying gut microbiome on the test results. Ten patients with GC were sampled for VOC over three consecutive days; 17 patients were sampled before and after H. pylori eradication therapy combined with a yeast probiotic; 61 patients were sampled before and after bowel cleansing (interventions affecting the microbiome). The samples were analyzed by: (1) gas chromatography linked to mass spectrometry (GC-MS), applying the non-parametric Wilcoxon test (level of significance p  <  0.05); (2) by cross-reactive nanoarrays combined with pattern recognition. Discriminant function analysis (DFA) was used to build the classification models; and leave-one-out cross-validation analysis was used to classify the findings. Exhaled VOCs profiles were stable for GC patients over a three day period. Alpha pinene (p  =  0.028) and ethyl acetate (p  =  0.030) increased after the antibiotic containing eradication regimen; acetone (p  =  0.0001) increased following bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. We further hypothesize that S. boulardii given with the standard eradication regimen to re-establish the gut microbiome was the source for long-term ethyl acetate production. Differences between the initial and the follow-up sample were also revealed in the DFA analysis of the sensor data. VOC measurement results are well-reproducible in GC patients indicating a useful basis for potential disease diagnostics. However, interventions with a potential effect on the gut microbiome may have an effect upon the VOC results, and therefore should be considered for diagnostic accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27341527     DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/10/3/037101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breath Res        ISSN: 1752-7155            Impact factor:   3.262


  7 in total

1.  Calibration and performance of synchronous SIM/scan mode for simultaneous targeted and discovery (non-targeted) analysis of exhaled breath samples from firefighters.

Authors:  M Ariel Geer Wallace; Joachim D Pleil; Sibel Mentese; Karen D Oliver; Donald A Whitaker; Kenneth W Fent
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  Effects of Sampling Conditions and Environmental Factors on Fecal Volatile Organic Compound Analysis by an Electronic Nose Device.

Authors:  Daniel J C Berkhout; Marc A Benninga; Ruby M van Stein; Paul Brinkman; Hendrik J Niemarkt; Nanne K H de Boer; Tim G J de Meij
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Volatile organic compounds in breath can serve as a non-invasive diagnostic biomarker for the detection of advanced adenomas and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kelly E van Keulen; Maud E Jansen; Ruud W M Schrauwen; Jeroen J Kolkman; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 4.  Are Volatile Organic Compounds Accurate Markers in the Assessment of Colorectal Cancer and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases? A Review.

Authors:  Filippo Vernia; Marco Valvano; Stefano Fabiani; Gianpiero Stefanelli; Salvatore Longo; Angelo Viscido; Giovanni Latella
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Monitoring the Reaction of the Body State to Antibiotic Treatment against Helicobacter pylori via Infrared Spectroscopy: A Case Study.

Authors:  Kiran Sankar Maiti; Alexander Apolonski
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 6.  Volatile Organic Compounds as Biomarkers of Gastrointestinal Diseases and Nutritional Status.

Authors:  Mariangela Rondanelli; Federica Perdoni; Vittoria Infantino; Milena Anna Faliva; Gabriella Peroni; Giancarlo Iannello; Mara Nichetti; Tariq A Alalwan; Simone Perna; Clementina Cocuzza
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 2.193

7.  Simultaneous Assessment of Urinary and Fecal Volatile Organic Compound Analysis in De Novo Pediatric IBD.

Authors:  Sofia El Manouni El Hassani; Sofie Bosch; Jesse P M Lemmen; Marina Brizzio Brentar; Ibrahim Ayada; Alfian N Wicaksono; James A Covington; Marc A Benninga; Nanne K H de Boer; Tim G J de Meij
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.