Literature DB >> 27341486

FISHing in the dark: How the combination of FISH and conventional karyotyping improves the diagnostic yield in CpG-stimulated chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Adrian M Dubuc1,2, Matthew S Davids2,3, Mirela Pulluqi1, Olja Pulluqi1, Kevin Hoang3, Jesus M Hernandez-Sánchez4, Cathy Schlich1, Jesus M Hernández-Rivas4,5, Jennifer R Brown2,3, Paola Dal Cin6,7.   

Abstract

Despite significant advances in molecular genetic approaches, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) remains the gold standard for the diagnostic evaluation of genomic aberrations in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Efforts to improve the diagnostic utility of molecular cytogenetic testing have led to the expansion of the traditional 4-probe CLL FISH panel. Not only do these efforts increase the cost of testing, they remain hindered by the inherent limitations of FISH studies - namely the inability to evaluate genomic changes outside of the targeted loci. While array-based profiling and next generation sequencing (NGS) have critically expanded our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of CLL, these methodologies are not routinely used by diagnostic laboratories to evaluate copy number changes or the mutational profile of this disease. Mitogenic stimulation of CLL specimens with CpG-oligonucleotide (CpG-ODN) has been identified as a reliable and reproducible means of obtaining a karyotype, facilitating a low-resolution genome-wide analysis. Across a cohort of 1255 CpG-ODN-stimulated CLL specimens, we describe the clinical utility associated with the combinatorial use of FISH and karyotyping. Our testing algorithm achieves a higher diagnostic yield (∼10%) through the detection of complex karyotypes, well-characterized chromosomal aberrations not covered by the traditional CLL FISH panel and through the detection of concurrent secondary malignancies. Moreover, the single cell nature of this approach permits the evaluation of emerging new clinical concepts including clonal dynamics and clonal evolution. This approach can be broadly applied by diagnostic laboratories to improve the utility of traditional and molecular cytogenetic studies of CLL. Am. J. Hematol. 91:978-983, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27341486     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  5 in total

1.  Cytogenetic complexity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: definitions, associations, and clinical impact.

Authors:  Panagiotis Baliakas; Sabine Jeromin; Michalis Iskas; Anna Puiggros; Karla Plevova; Florence Nguyen-Khac; Zadie Davis; Gian Matteo Rigolin; Andrea Visentin; Aliki Xochelli; Julio Delgado; Fanny Baran-Marszak; Evangelia Stalika; Pau Abrisqueta; Kristina Durechova; George Papaioannou; Virginie Eclache; Maria Dimou; Theodoros Iliakis; Rosa Collado; Michael Doubek; M Jose Calasanz; Neus Ruiz-Xiville; Carolina Moreno; Marie Jarosova; Alexander C Leeksma; Panayiotis Panayiotidis; Helena Podgornik; Florence Cymbalista; Achilles Anagnostopoulos; Livio Trentin; Niki Stavroyianni; Fred Davi; Paolo Ghia; Arnon P Kater; Antonio Cuneo; Sarka Pospisilova; Blanca Espinet; Anastasia Athanasiadou; David Oscier; Claudia Haferlach; Kostas Stamatopoulos
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Comparison of Diagnostic Yield of a FISH Panel Against Conventional Cytogenetic Studies for Hematological Malignancies: A South Indian Referral Laboratory Analysis Of 201 Cases

Authors:  Vishal Ashok; Ramya Ranganathan; Smitha Chander; Sharat Damodar; Sunil Bhat; Nataraj K S; Satish Kumar A; Sachin Suresh Jadav; Mahesh Rajashekaraiah; Sundareshan T S
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-12-29

3.  Long range haplotyping of paired-homologous chromosomes by single-chromosome sequencing of a single cell.

Authors:  Deng Luo; Meng Zhang; Ting Liu; Wei Cao; Jiajie Guo; Caiping Mao; Yifan Li; Juanmei Wang; Weiren Huang; Daru Lu; Shuo Zhang; Zhoufang Li; Jiankui He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Morphological, immunophenotypic, and genetic features of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with trisomy 12: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Francesco Autore; Paolo Strati; Luca Laurenti; Alessandra Ferrajoli
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Twists and turns from "tumor in tumor" profiling: surveillance of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) leads to detection of a lung adenocarcinoma, whose genomic characterization alters the original hematologic diagnosis.

Authors:  David H Hwang; Adrian M Dubuc; Panieh Terraf; Lynette M Sholl; Matthew S Davids; Mark M Awad; Elizabeth P Garcia; Laura E MacConaill; Paola Dal Cin; Annette Kim; Neal I Lindeman; Matthew Stachler
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud       Date:  2021-08-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.