William R Corbin1, Caitlin J Scott1, Teresa A Treat2. 1. Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona. 2. Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Prior studies have demonstrated an association between high-risk sexual behavior and alcohol use, and there is emerging evidence that dating status and sexual behavior are related to risk for subsequent alcohol use. However, relatively little is known regarding the specific attitudinal or behavioral indicators of alcohol-related risk associated with sexual behavior. The present study distinguished between sociosexual attitudes and sociosexual behaviors, two aspects of sexual risk that may contribute to individual differences in drinking behavior. The primary hypothesis was that sociosexual attitudes would indirectly contribute to heavier drinking through greater engagement in sociosexual behaviors. METHOD: Study hypotheses were tested using baseline data from an alcohol challenge study in a sample of young adult heavy drinkers (n = 211, 73.7% male). Participants completed surveys assessing typical drinking behavior and both sociosexual attitudes and sociosexual behaviors. RESULTS: As hypothesized, sociosexual attitudes were indirectly related to heavier alcohol use through greater engagement in sociosexual behavior. However, the relation between sociosexual attitudes and sociosexual behaviors was stronger for men, as were the indirect effects of sociosexual attitudes on drinking behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Engagement in sociosexual behavior appears to be a risk factor for heavy alcohol use. This highlights the potential utility of targeted alcohol interventions in settings associated with sexual risk, including sexually transmitted infection clinics and college campuses. Future research should explore the mechanisms through which sociosexual behaviors contribute to drinking outcomes to further inform targeted alcohol interventions and to bolster protective factors among those who engage in sociosexual behaviors.
OBJECTIVE: Prior studies have demonstrated an association between high-risk sexual behavior and alcohol use, and there is emerging evidence that dating status and sexual behavior are related to risk for subsequent alcohol use. However, relatively little is known regarding the specific attitudinal or behavioral indicators of alcohol-related risk associated with sexual behavior. The present study distinguished between sociosexual attitudes and sociosexual behaviors, two aspects of sexual risk that may contribute to individual differences in drinking behavior. The primary hypothesis was that sociosexual attitudes would indirectly contribute to heavier drinking through greater engagement in sociosexual behaviors. METHOD: Study hypotheses were tested using baseline data from an alcohol challenge study in a sample of young adult heavy drinkers (n = 211, 73.7% male). Participants completed surveys assessing typical drinking behavior and both sociosexual attitudes and sociosexual behaviors. RESULTS: As hypothesized, sociosexual attitudes were indirectly related to heavier alcohol use through greater engagement in sociosexual behavior. However, the relation between sociosexual attitudes and sociosexual behaviors was stronger for men, as were the indirect effects of sociosexual attitudes on drinking behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Engagement in sociosexual behavior appears to be a risk factor for heavy alcohol use. This highlights the potential utility of targeted alcohol interventions in settings associated with sexual risk, including sexually transmitted infection clinics and college campuses. Future research should explore the mechanisms through which sociosexual behaviors contribute to drinking outcomes to further inform targeted alcohol interventions and to bolster protective factors among those who engage in sociosexual behaviors.
Authors: Robert Whelan; Richard Watts; Catherine A Orr; Robert R Althoff; Eric Artiges; Tobias Banaschewski; Gareth J Barker; Arun L W Bokde; Christian Büchel; Fabiana M Carvalho; Patricia J Conrod; Herta Flor; Mira Fauth-Bühler; Vincent Frouin; Juergen Gallinat; Gabriela Gan; Penny Gowland; Andreas Heinz; Bernd Ittermann; Claire Lawrence; Karl Mann; Jean-Luc Martinot; Frauke Nees; Nick Ortiz; Marie-Laure Paillère-Martinot; Tomas Paus; Zdenka Pausova; Marcella Rietschel; Trevor W Robbins; Michael N Smolka; Andreas Ströhle; Gunter Schumann; Hugh Garavan Journal: Nature Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Renato Polimanti; Qian Wang; Shashwath A Meda; Krishna T Patel; Godfrey D Pearlson; Hongyu Zhao; Lindsay A Farrer; Henry R Kranzler; Joel Gelernter Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Alexander J Melkonian; Lindsay S Ham; Jacquelyn D Wiersma-Mosley; Kyle K Jackson; Alita M Mobley; Kristen N Jozkowski; Malachi Willis; Ana J Bridges Journal: Psychol Violence Date: 2020-03-09