Literature DB >> 27340924

Analysis of multi-dimensional contemporaneous EHR data to refine delirium assessments.

John P Corradi1, Jyoti Chhabra2, Jeffrey F Mather2, Christine M Waszynski3, Robert S Dicks3.   

Abstract

Delirium is a potentially lethal condition of altered mental status, attention, and level of consciousness with an acute onset and fluctuating course. Its causes are multi-factorial, and its pathophysiology is not well understood; therefore clinical focus has been on prevention strategies and early detection. One patient evaluation technique in routine use is the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM): a relatively simple test resulting in 'positive', 'negative' or 'unable-to-assess' (UTA) ratings. Hartford Hospital nursing staff use the CAM regularly on all non-critical care units, and a high frequency of UTA was observed after reviewing several years of records. In addition, patients with UTA ratings displayed poor outcomes such as in-hospital mortality, longer lengths of stay, and discharge to acute and long term care facilities. We sought to better understand the use of UTA, especially outside of critical care environments, in order to improve delirium detection throughout the hospital. An unsupervised clustering approach was used with additional, concurrent assessment data available in the EHR to categorize patient visits with UTA CAMs. The results yielded insights into the most common situations in which the UTA rating was used (e.g. impaired verbal communication, dementia), suggesting potentially inappropriate ratings that could be refined with further evaluation and remedied with updated clinical training. Analysis of the patient clusters also suggested that unrecognized delirium may contribute to the poor outcomes associated with the use of UTA. This method of using temporally related high dimensional EHR data to illuminate a dynamic medical condition could have wider applicability.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clustering; Controlled vocabulary; Delirium; Electronic health records; Patient outcomes; Unable-to-assess

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27340924     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  2 in total

1.  Prediction of Incident Delirium Using a Random Forest classifier.

Authors:  John P Corradi; Stephen Thompson; Jeffrey F Mather; Christine M Waszynski; Robert S Dicks
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Positive scores on the 4AT delirium assessment tool at hospital admission are linked to mortality, length of stay and home time: two-centre study of 82,770 emergency admissions.

Authors:  Atul Anand; Michael Cheng; Temi Ibitoye; Alasdair M J Maclullich; Emma R L C Vardy
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 10.668

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.