Literature DB >> 27340758

Reproducing the location-based context-specific proportion congruent effect for frequency unbiased items: A reply to Hutcheon and Spieler (2016).

Matthew J C Crump1, Nicholaus P Brosowsky2, Bruce Milliken3.   

Abstract

Stroop effects can be modulated by context-specific cues associated with different levels of proportion congruent, even for items that appear equally frequently in each context. This result has important theoretical implications, because it rules out frequency-driven learning explanations of context-specific proportion congruent (CSPC) effects and leaves open the possibility that a cue-driven retrieval process can reinstate attentional control settings in a rapid online fashion. The purpose of the present work was to address reproducibility concerns that have been raised about this finding. We conducted several reproductions and novel extensions using Amazon's mechanical Turk in both Stroop and flanker tasks. We successfully replicated the central finding that CSPC effects can be observed for frequency-unbiased items. We also provide new Monte Carlo simulation analyses to estimate reproducibility of the phenomena that show important limitations on these designs for measuring contextual control.

Keywords:  Attention; Automaticity; Contextual control; Proportion congruent; Replication

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27340758     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1206130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  9 in total

Review 1.  Evidence against conflict monitoring and adaptation: An updated review.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

2.  Boundary conditions for the influence of spatial proximity on context-specific attentional settings.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Diede; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  What is cued by faces in the face-based context-specific proportion congruent manipulation?

Authors:  Thomas Hutcheon
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Meaningful boundaries create boundary conditions for control.

Authors:  Jackson S Colvett; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-08-29

5.  Evaluating the learning of stimulus-control associations through incidental memory of reinforcement events.

Authors:  Christina Bejjani; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 3.140

6.  Appealing to the cognitive miser: Using demand avoidance to modulate cognitive flexibility in cued and voluntary task switching.

Authors:  Nicholaus P Brosowsky; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 7.  Cortical and subcortical contributions to context-control learning.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Context-Specific Proportion Congruency Effects: An Episodic Learning Account and Computational Model.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-16

Review 9.  Measuring Adaptive Control in Conflict Tasks.

Authors:  Senne Braem; Julie M Bugg; James R Schmidt; Matthew J C Crump; Daniel H Weissman; Wim Notebaert; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 20.229

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.