| Literature DB >> 27340663 |
Pierre Le Bars1, Gaston Niagha1, Ayepa Alain Kouadio1, Julien Demoersman2, Elisabeth Roy3, Valérie Armengol4, Assem Soueidan5.
Abstract
Background. Histopathological alterations can arise when the denture-supporting mucosa experiences microbial and mechanical stress through the denture base and diagnosis of these diseases usually follows microvascular changes. Microcirculation measurement could allow for detection of such dysfunction and aid in the early diagnosis of palatal mucosa pathologies. Materials and Methods. We tested the sensitivity of laser Doppler for measuring the microcirculation of the palatal mucosa, assessing the median raphe (MR), Schroeder area (SA), and retroincisive papilla (RP). A Doppler PeriFlux 5000 System, containing a laser diode, was used. 54 healthy participants were recruited. We compare the measurements of PU (perfusion unit) using ANOVA test. Results. The numerical values for palatal mucosa blood flow differed significantly among the anatomical areas (p = 0.0167). The mean value of Schroeder area was 92.6 (SD: 38.4) and was significantly higher than the retroincisive papilla (51.9) (SD: 20.2) (p < 0.05), which in turn was higher than that of median raphe (31.9) (SD: 24.2) (p < 0.0001). Conclusion. Schroeder area appeared to have the greatest sensitivity, and vascular flow variability among individuals was also greatest in this region. We suggest that analysis of blood stream modification with laser Doppler of the palatal mucosa can help to detect onset signs of pathological alterations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27340663 PMCID: PMC4908244 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5749150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Diagram showing the branches of the artery great palate (GPA) and bony prominences palatine. The GPA emerges through the greater palatine foramen (GPF) from the maxillary artery, runs along the palatal spine (PS), and is divided into lateral branch (LB) and canine branch (CB), and leads to the incisive foramen (IC).
Figure 2Thermoformed trays in the mouth (a) with three brackets for attaching the probe during recording (retroincisive papilla, median raphe, and Schroeder area) (b).
Figure 3Scatterplot of individual measured values in the three zones. Statistically significant difference between the different anatomical areas (p value < 0.05). We found that the average value at the Schroeder area (PU = ±92) was significantly higher than that measured at the retroincisive papilla (PU = ±51.92) (p < 0.05), which is higher than the median raphe (PU = ±31.97) (p < 0.0001). (The red line shows the average blood flow measurements in the three study areas.)
Figure 4Mean comparisons of PU measure between smokers and nonsmokers patients in Schroeder area. The average values of the three zones were generally higher in smokers than in nonsmokers. However, this difference was only statistically significant for the Schroeder area (p = 0.005).
Figure 5Scatterplot values in Schroeder area in nonsmokers (a) and smokers (b).