| Literature DB >> 27340526 |
Panpan Hu1, Miao Yu1, Xiaoguang Liu1, Zhongjun Liu1, Liang Jiang1, Feng Wei1, Zhongqiang Chen1.
Abstract
STUDYEntities:
Keywords: Cerebrospinal fluid leakage; Incidence; Risk factors; Thoracic decompression
Year: 2016 PMID: 27340526 PMCID: PMC4917765 DOI: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.3.472
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Spine J ISSN: 1976-1902
Surgical approaches for different clinical scenariosa)
a)Suitable for the majority of the cohort but allowing for exceptions for whom another surgical approach was finally performed.
Incidences of cerebrospinal fluid leakage for the entire cohort and each surgical approach
Comparison between the groups with and without cerebrospinal fluid leakage
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association.
a)Statistically significant at p <0.05, unpaired student t test (two-tailed).
Analysis of clinical predisposing factors for CSF leakage
CSF, stands for cerebrospinal fluid; OPLL, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament; JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association; CD, circumferential decompression.
a)Accomplished via Pearson's χ2 test (two-tailed), and p <0.05 indicates clinical factors associated with CSF leakage; b)Accomplished via multiple logistic regression analysis, and p <0.05 indicates significant clinical predictors for CSF leakage.
Fig. 1Diagram displaying odds ratio value of each thoracic vertebra for cerebrospinal fluid leakage. It showed that T5 (odds ratio [OR], 2.01), T6 (OR 3.01) and T7 (OR 3.77) had higher OR values than other thoracic vertebrae.
Fig. 2Diagram displaying the relationship between preoperative JOA scores and operative segments in this cohort. The trend line indicates that operative segments negatively correlated with preoperative JOA scores (r =–0.272, p <0.05, two-tailed Spearman's correlation test). JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association.