| Literature DB >> 27340460 |
Luíse Azevedo1, Larissa Faqueti1, Marina Kritsanida2, Antonia Efstathiou3, Despina Smirlis3, Gilberto C Franchi4, Grégory Genta-Jouve2, Sylvie Michel2, Louis P Sandjo1, Raphaël Grougnet2, Maique Weber Biavatti1.
Abstract
Jungia sellowii (Asteraceae) is a shrub that grows in Southern Brazil and polar extract of its leaves presents anti-inflammatory properties. Cyperane, guaiane, nortrixane, and trixane sesquiterpene types were reported as the main metabolites in Jungia species. This work aims to describe the isolation and identification of sesquiterpenes in the leaves of J. sellowii using liquid-liquid partition and centrifugal partition chromatography. Thus, the crude extract of fresh leaves of J. sellowii was partitioned with hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate and butanol, respectively. The butanol fraction was then subjected to a selected ternary system optimized for the CPC (centrifugal partition chromatography): ethyl acetate-ethanol-water (9:2:10, v/v/v). The separation was carried out isocratically at a flow rate of 25 mL/min at 1200 rpm, affording seven fractions A to G. TLC of fractions B, C and F displayed a single spot corresponding to three new glycosylated sesquiterpenoids. Their structures were established by using spectroscopic data in comparison to those reported in the literature. Furthermore, the isolates were evaluated for their leishmanicidal and cytotoxic effects. No cytotoxic effect was observed against the three cancer cell lines (HL60, JURKAT and REH), but compound 1 showed a weak antiprotozoal activity. Liquid-liquid partition and CPC turned to be a versatile technique of glycoside purification which is environmentally friendly and requires a limited amount of organic solvents.Entities:
Keywords: CPC; Jungia; guaiane; trixanolide
Year: 2016 PMID: 27340460 PMCID: PMC4902082 DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.12.68
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Org Chem ISSN: 1860-5397 Impact factor: 2.883
Experimental conditions evaluated by using the shake-flask method.
| Condition | Ethyl acetate | Ethanol | Water |
| 1 | 9 | 2 | 10 |
| 2 | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| 3 | 7 | 2 | 10 |
| 4 | 9 | 1 | 10 |
| 5 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 6 | 8 | 3 | 10 |
Figure 1UPLC profile of the butanol fraction of the leaves of Jungia sellowii after shaking the flask with the selected biphasic system (details in the Experimental section). UP: upper phase (top chromatogram), LP: lower phase (bottom chromatogram). Detection at 242 nm.
Figure 2Structures of compounds 1–3.
1H NMR data [400 MHz, (CD3)2CO] of compounds 1–3.
| Position | Aglycone | ||
| 1 | 1.66 (m), 2.07 (m) | 1.72 (dd, 4.4, 11.5 Hz), | 3.35 (m) |
| 2 | 2.38 (m) | 2.17 (m) | 1.96 (m), |
| 3 | 2.44 (t, 3.6 Hz) | 4.43 (dd, 2.1, 4.1 Hz) | – |
| 4 | 6.79 (t, 3.6 Hz) | 6.71 (dd, 1.5, 4.1 Hz) | – |
| 5 | – | – | – |
| 6 | – | – | 4.93 (br s) |
| 7 | 2.11 (m) | 2.14 (m) | 1.97 (m) |
| 8 | 1.58 (m), 2.00 (m) | 1.71 (m), 2.05 (m) | 1.09 (m), 1.30 (m) |
| 9 | 1.63 (m), 1.69 (m) | 1.56 (m), 1.67 (m) | 1.57 (m), 2.02 (m) |
| 10 | 2.12 (overlapped) | 1.90 (m) | 2.51 (m) |
| 11 | – | – | – |
| 12 | 1.12 (s) | 1.05 (s) | 1.91 (br s) |
| 13 | 3.39 (d, 9.2 Hz), | 1.10 (s) | 4.82 (m), 4.97 (br s) |
| 14 | 4.04 (dd, 5.5, 11.7 Hz), 4.17 (dd, 4.3, 11.7 Hz) | 4.11 (dd, 4.9, 11.7 Hz), | 0.93 (d, 7.2 Hz) |
| 15 | – | – | 1.66 (br d, 2.2 Hz) |
| Glucopyranosyl | |||
| 1´ | 4.28 (d, 7.7 Hz) | 4.47 (d, 7.7 Hz) | 4.39 (d, 7.8 Hz) |
| 2´ | 3.20 ( | 3.16 (dd, 7.7, 8.8 Hz) | 3.27 (m) |
| 3´ | 3.38 (m) | 3.38 (m) | 3.24 (m) |
| 4´ | 3.32 (m) | 3.33 (m) | 3.33 (m) |
| 5´ | 3.30 (m) | 3.33 (m) | 3.37 (m) |
| 6´ | 3.65 (dd, 5.0, 11.5 Hz), | 3.66 (dd, 4.9, 11.7 Hz), | 3.55 (dd, 5.5, 11.7 Hz) |
13C NMR data [100 MHz, (CD3)2CO] of compounds 1–3.
| Position | Aglycone | ||
| 1 | 39.5 | 35.7 | 44.6 |
| 2 | 43.0 | 53.4 | 36.8 |
| 3 | 32.3 | 74.9 | 208.5 |
| 4 | 139.7 | 137.3 | 134.0 |
| 5 | 137.5 | 139.5 | 177.8 |
| 6 | 53.8 | 54.7 | 80.9 |
| 7 | 40.3 | 40.5 | 52.3 |
| 8 | 31.0 | 31.5 | 30.1 |
| 9 | 25.9 | 27.0 | 29.2 |
| 10 | 65.2 | 63.2 | 33.2 |
| 11 | 47.7 | 40.1 | 149.3 |
| 12 | 24.7 | 28.7 | 22.9 |
| 13 | 76.4 | 28.4 | 110.9 |
| 14 | 68.7 | 68.8 | 20.3 |
| 15 | 165.5 | 165.6 | 7.4 |
| Glucopyranosyl | |||
| 1´ | 104.7 | 103.6 | 104.8 |
| 2´ | 75.0 | 74.9 | 74.8 |
| 3´ | 78.0 | 78.0 | 77.1 |
| 4´ | 71.8 | 71.7 | 70.9 |
| 5´ | 77.4 | 77.6 | 76.5 |
| 6´ | 63.0 | 63.0 | 62.1 |
Figure 3COSY and HMBC correlations of compounds 1–3.
Figure 4NOESY correlations of compounds 1–3.
Figure 5ECD spectra of compounds 1–3.