Literature DB >> 27340315

Methods to Assess Measurement Error in Questionnaires of Sedentary Behavior.

Joshua N Sampson1, Charles E Matthews2, Laurence Freedman3, Raymond J Carroll4, Victor Kipnis5.   

Abstract

Sedentary behavior has already been associated with mortality, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Questionnaires are an affordable tool for measuring sedentary behavior in large epidemiological studies. Here, we introduce and evaluate two statistical methods for quantifying measurement error in questionnaires. Accurate estimates are needed for assessing questionnaire quality. The two methods would be applied to validation studies that measure a sedentary behavior by both questionnaire and accelerometer on multiple days. The first method fits a reduced model by assuming the accelerometer is without error, while the second method fits a more complete model that allows both measures to have error. Because accelerometers tend to be highly accurate, we show that ignoring the accelerometer's measurement error, can result in more accurate estimates of measurement error in some scenarios. In this manuscript, we derive asymptotic approximations for the Mean-Squared Error of the estimated parameters from both methods, evaluate their dependence on study design and behavior characteristics, and offer an R package so investigators can make an informed choice between the two methods. We demonstrate the difference between the two methods in a recent validation study comparing Previous Day Recalls (PDR) to an accelerometer-based ActivPal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PDR; measurement error; questionnaire; sedentary

Year:  2016        PMID: 27340315      PMCID: PMC4915393          DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2015.1117593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Stat        ISSN: 0266-4763            Impact factor:   1.404


  32 in total

1.  Implications of a new dietary measurement error model for estimation of relative risk: application to four calibration studies.

Authors:  V Kipnis; R J Carroll; L S Freedman; L Li
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Regression analysis when covariates are regression parameters of a random effects model for observed longitudinal measurements.

Authors:  C Y Wang; N Wang; S Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Impact of exposure measurement error in nutritional epidemiology.

Authors:  Victor Kipnis; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Measurement error in dietary data: implications for the epidemiologic study of the diet-disease relationship.

Authors:  S Paeratakul; B M Popkin; L Kohlmeier; I Hertz-Picciotto; X Guo; L J Edwards
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 5.  Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.

Authors:  G Atkinson; A M Nevill
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults a systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996-2011.

Authors:  Alicia A Thorp; Neville Owen; Maike Neuhaus; David W Dunstan
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Dealing with dietary measurement error in nutritional cohort studies.

Authors:  Laurence S Freedman; Arthur Schatzkin; Douglas Midthune; Victor Kipnis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Measurement error in dietary assessment: an investigation using covariance structure models. Part I.

Authors:  M Plummer; D Clayton
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Validation of a previous-day recall measure of active and sedentary behaviors.

Authors:  Charles E Matthews; Sarah Kozey Keadle; Joshua Sampson; Kate Lyden; Heather R Bowles; Stephen C Moore; Amanda Libertine; Patty S Freedson; Jay H Fowke
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer.

Authors:  Dale W Esliger; Ann V Rowlands; Tina L Hurst; Michael Catt; Peter Murray; Roger G Eston
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.