| Literature DB >> 27340154 |
Jonathan W Kunstman1, Taylor Tuscherer2, Sophie Trawalter3, E Paige Lloyd4.
Abstract
Antiprejudice norms and attempts to conceal racial bias have made Whites' positive treatment of racial minorities attributionally ambiguous. Although some minorities believe Whites' positivity is genuine, others are suspicious of Whites' motives and believe their kindness is primarily motivated by desires to avoid appearing prejudiced. For those suspicious of Whites' motives, Whites' smiles may paradoxically function as threat cues. To the extent that Whites' smiles cue threat among suspicious minorities, we hypothesized that suspicious minorities would explicitly perceive Whites' smiles as threatening (Study 1), automatically orient to smiling White-as opposed to smiling Black-targets (Study 2), and accurately discriminate between Whites' real and fake smiles (Study 3). These results provide convergent evidence that cues typically associated with acceptance and affiliation ironically function as threat cues among suspicious racial minorities.Entities:
Keywords: attributional ambiguity; emotion perception; intergroup processes; stigma
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27340154 DOI: 10.1177/0146167216652860
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pers Soc Psychol Bull ISSN: 0146-1672