| Literature DB >> 27339862 |
Christos D Gerofotis1, Charalampos S Ioannou1, Christos T Nakas2,3, Nikos T Papadopoulos1.
Abstract
Food quality shapes life history traits either directly or through response of individuals to additional environmental factors, such as chemical cues. Plant extracts used as food additives modulate key life history traits; however little is known regarding such effects for olfactory chemical cues. Exploiting an interesting experimental system that involves the olive fly (Bactrocera oleae) and the plant metabolite α-pinene we asked whether exposure of adults to this compound modulates adult longevity and female reproduction in similar manner in a stressful - dietary (protein) restricted (DR) and in a relaxed- full diet (FD) feeding environment. Accordingly, we exposed males and females to the aroma of α-pinene and measured lifespan and age-specific fecundity in the above two dietary contexts. Our results demonstrate that exposure to α-pinene increased longevity in males and fecundity in females only under dietary restricted conditions. In relaxed food conditions, females exposed to α-pinene shifted high egg-laying towards younger ages compared to non-exposed ones. This is the first report demonstrating that a plant compound affects key life history traits of adult olive flies through olfaction. These effects are sex-specific and more pronounced in dietary restricted adults. Possible underlying mechanisms and the ecological significance are discussed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27339862 PMCID: PMC4919778 DOI: 10.1038/srep28540
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Longevity parameters of adult olive flies that were exposed and non-exposed to the aroma of α-pinene and held in diet restriction (DR) and full diet (FD) food conditions.
| Adult cohort (Number of individuals) | Longevity parameters in days ± SE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | Quartiles | |||
| 25 | 50 | 75 | ||
| FD | ||||
| Exposed (n = 48) | 56.37 ± 5.01a | 58 ± 9.00 | 47 ± 2.15 | 36 ± 1.12 |
| Non-exposed (n = 47) | 51.42 ± 4.74a | 54 ± 3.73 | 45 ± 3.42 | 33 ± 1.99 |
| DR | ||||
| Exposed (n = 49) | 49.63 ± 2.76a | 61 ± 3.51 | 49 ± 4.49 | 37 ± 2.63 |
| Non-exposed (n = 47) | 41.95 ± 1.87b | 50 ± 1.60 | 42 ± 2.28 | 33 ± 2.98 |
| FD | ||||
| Exposed (n = 44) | 78.92 ± 6.03a | 114 ± 25.97 | 60 ± 2.94 | 48 ± 3.61 |
| Non-exposed (n = 53) | 83.96 ± 6.75a | 132 ± 19.69 | 64 ± 5.09 | 46 ± 5.96 |
| DR | ||||
| Exposed (n = 50) | 59.68 ± 3.70a | 66 ± 3.41 | 53 ± 3.03 | 46 ± 3.54 |
| Non-exposed (n = 51) | 58.87 ± 3.09a | 64 ± 3.39 | 56 ± 2.28 | 46 ± 1.56 |
Within sex, numbers followed by different letters are significantly different (pairwise comparisons log-rank test, P < 0.05).
Figure 1Age-specific survival patterns of adult olive flies that were either exposed (solid line) or non-exposed (dashed line) to α-pinene: (a) males in full diet (FD) conditions, (b) males in diet restriction (DR), (c) females in full diet (FD) conditions, and (d) females in diet restriction (DR) conditions. (Log-rank pairwise tests reveal significant differences between exposed and non-exposed males fed in sugar, P < 0.05).
Figure 2Box plots depicting life time fecundity rates (eggs per female) of females experiencing FD (a) and DR (b) food conditions and had either exposed or remained unexposed to α-pinene. Asterisk indicates significant differences between female cohorts (squared Wald test x2 = 81.219; df = 1; P < 0.05).
Figure 3Age-specific fecundity of exposed (solid black line) and non-exposed (dashed black line) females in FD (a) and in DR food conditions (b). Red solid (exposed) and green dashed (non-exposed) lines represent data of female fecundity after smoothing of 5-days period, in the respective food regimes.