Literature DB >> 27339844

The Electrocardiogram After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Determines the Risk for Post-Procedural High-Degree AV Block and the Need for Telemetry Monitoring.

Stefan Toggweiler1, Stefan Stortecky2, Erik Holy3, Katarzyna Zuk2, Florim Cuculi4, Fabian Nietlispach3, Zaid Sabti4, Raluca Suciu3, Willibald Maier3, Peiman Jamshidi4, Francesco Maisano3, Stephan Windecker2, Richard Kobza4, Peter Wenaweser2, Thomas F Lüscher3, Ronald K Binder3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study sought to identify predictors for delayed high-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and determine the need and required duration of telemetry monitoring.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about predictors and timing of high-degree AVB.
METHODS: A total of 1,064 patients (52% women) without a permanent pacemaker undergoing TAVR at 3 centers in Switzerland were investigated. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) at baseline and post-TAVR were analyzed to identify atrioventricular and interventricular conduction disorders.
RESULTS: Periprocedural high-degree AVB occurred in 92 (8.7%), delayed high-degree AVB in 71 (6.7%), up to 8 days post-procedure. In multivariate analysis, delayed high-degree AVB occurred more frequently in men (odds ratio: 2.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.3 to 4.5; p < 0.01), and in patients with conduction disorders post-TAVR (odds ratio: 10.8; 95% confidence interval: 4.6 to 25.5; p < 0.01). Patients in sinus rhythm without conduction disorders post-TAVR did not develop delayed high-degree AVB (0 of 250, 0%). Similarly, the risk in patients with atrial fibrillation but no other conduction disorders was very low (1 of 102, 1%). There was no patient developing delayed high-degree AVB who had a stable ECG for 2 days or more.
CONCLUSION: Patients without conduction disorders post-TAVR did not develop delayed high-degree AVB. Such patients may not require telemetry monitoring. All other patients should be monitored until the ECG remains stable for at least 2 days. This algorithm should be validated in a separate patient population.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic stenosis; conduction disorders; heart block; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27339844     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  18 in total

Review 1.  Pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve: why is this still happening?

Authors:  Stefan Toggweiler; Richard Kobza
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  2020 update of the Austrian Society of Cardiology (ÖKG) and the Austrian Society of Cardiac Surgery (ÖGHTG) on the position statement of the ÖKG and ÖGHTG for transcatheter aortic valve implantation 2011.

Authors:  Gudrun Lamm; Matthias Hammerer; Uta C Hoppe; Martin Andreas; Rudolf Berger; Ronald K Binder; Nikolaos Bonaros; Georg Delle-Karth; Matthias Frick; Michael Grund; Bernhard Metzler; Thomas Neunteufl; Philipp Pichler; Albrecht Schmidt; Wilfried Wisser; Andreas Zierer; Rainald Seitelberger; Michael Grimm; Alexander Geppert
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Long-Term Ventricular Pacing Dependency and Pacemaker Implantation Predictors after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - A 1-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Ricardo Alves Pinto; Tânia Proença; Miguel Martins Carvalho; Gonçalo Pestana; Ana Lebreiro; Luis Adão; Filipe Macedo
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.667

4.  Predictors of high-degree atrioventricular block in patients with new-onset left bundle branch block following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Nashwa M Abdulsalam; Jeanne E Poole; Elizabeth R Lyden; Arthur J Easley; Gregory S Pavlides; Shane F Tsai; David E Barton
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 1.759

Review 5.  Simplified TAVR Procedure: How Far Is It Possible to Go?

Authors:  Florence Leclercq; Pierre Alain Meunier; Thomas Gandet; Jean-Christophe Macia; Delphine Delseny; Philippe Gaudard; Marc Mourad; Laurent Schmutz; Pierre Robert; François Roubille; Guillaume Cayla; Mariama Akodad
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the developing world: Lessons learnt and its implications for practice.

Authors:  Rajat Datta; Prashant Bharadwaj; Naveen Aggarwal; G Keshavamurthy; Prafull Sharma; Nitin Bajaj; Vijay Bohra; V S Guleria; Balbir Singh
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2022-02-01

Review 7.  Atrioventricular and intraventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Jane J Lee; Nora Goldschlager; Vaikom S Mahadevan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-06-24       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Characteristics of and current practice patterns of pacing for high-degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in comparison to surgical aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Naoki Misumida; Mariah Pagath; Gbolahan O Ogunbayo; Ryan E Wilson; Sun Moon Kim; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Claude S Elayi
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Advances in transcatheter aortic valve implantation, part 2: perioperative care.

Authors:  M Charlesworth; B G Williams; M H Buch
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2021-03-19

Review 10.  TAVI and Post Procedural Cardiac Conduction Abnormalities.

Authors:  Antonio Mangieri; Claudio Montalto; Matteo Pagnesi; Giuseppe Lanzillo; Ozan Demir; Luca Testa; Antonio Colombo; Azeem Latib
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-07-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.