Literature DB >> 27339776

Changes in blood center red blood cell distributions in the era of patient blood management: the trends for collection (TFC) study.

Mark H Yazer1, Bryon Jackson1, Neil Beckman2, Stuart Chesneau2, Patrick Bowler3, Meghan Delaney4, Dana Devine5, Stephen Field6, Marc Germain7, Mike F Murphy8, Merlyn Sayers9, Beth Shaz10, Eilat Shinar11, Minoko Takanashi12, Ralph Vassallo13, Crispin Wickenden8, Vered Yahalom11, Kevin Land14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As patient blood management becomes more widespread, fewer red blood cell (RBC) units have been transfused. This multinational study evaluated changes in blood center RBC distributions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data on number and ABO and D groups of RBC distributions were obtained from several large American blood centers and national or provincial blood services (NPBS) from fiscal year (FY) 2010 through FY2014. Due to relatively larger numbers of distributions and differences in ABO and D groups between the Japanese Red Cross and the other NPBS, Japanese data were not included in distributions calculations.
RESULTS: Data from seven American blood centers and eight NPBS were obtained. Overall, at both the American and the seven NPBS that were analyzed, there were declines in the number of RBC distributions between FY2010 and FY2014, 16.9 and 8.0%, respectively. The number of O- RBC distributions decreased by 9.0% at American blood centers but the proportion of RBC distributions that were O- increased by 9.3% during this time. The NPBS had 1.6% increase in O- RBC distributions and 10.5% increase in the proportion of O- distributions. The proportion of O+ distributions increased slightly over time at American centers (2.9%) while decreasing slightly (1.1%) at NPBS despite reductions in the absolute numbers of O+ distributions. Overall there was 2.6% decrease in the proportion of B+ and AB+ RBCs distributed and 13.6% absolute reduction in the number of these units distributed.
CONCLUSION: Although overall RBC distributions have decreased over time, the proportion of O units has increased substantially.
© 2016 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27339776     DOI: 10.1111/trf.13696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  6 in total

Review 1.  Transfusion-related red blood cell alloantibodies: induction and consequences.

Authors:  Christopher A Tormey; Jeanne E Hendrickson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Rhesus pieces: genotype matching of RBCs.

Authors:  Jeanne E Hendrickson; Christopher A Tormey
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Supplemental findings of the 2017 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey.

Authors:  Mathew R P Sapiano; Jefferson M Jones; Alexandra A Savinkina; Kathryn A Haass; James J Berger; Sridhar V Basavaraju
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.337

4.  Should Men who have sex with Men be allowed to donate blood in Israel?

Authors:  Gary Michael Ginsberg; Eilat Shinar; Eran Kopel; Daniel Chemtob
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2016-12-13

5.  Frequencies and ethnic distribution of ABO and RhD blood groups in China: a population-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jue Liu; Shikun Zhang; Qiaomei Wang; Haiping Shen; Yiping Zhang; Min Liu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-03       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Estimating the risks of prehospital transfusion of D-positive whole blood to trauma patients who are bleeding in England.

Authors:  Rebecca Cardigan; Tom Latham; Anne Weaver; Mark Yazer; Laura Green
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.