| Literature DB >> 27339612 |
Amal M Al-Amri1, Po-Han Fu1, Kun-Yu Lai2, Hsin-Ping Wang1, Lain-Jong Li3, Jr-Hau He1.
Abstract
An effective light-harvesting scheme for InGaN-based multiple quantum well solar cells is demonstrated using stacking layers of polystyrene nanospheres. Light-harvesting efficiencies on the solar cells covered with varied stacks of nanospheres are evaluated through numerical and experimental methods. The numerical simulation reveals that nanospheres with 3 stacking layers exhibit the most improved optical absorption and haze ratio as compared to those obtained by monolayer nanospheres. The experimental demonstration, agreeing with the theoretical analyses, shows that the application of 3-layer nanospheres improves the conversion efficiency of the solar cell by ~31%.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27339612 PMCID: PMC4919627 DOI: 10.1038/srep28671
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1FDTD simulation of TE electric field distribution, |Ez|, within the solar cells of different surface conditions: (a) bare; (b) 1-layer; (c) 3-layer; and (d) 5-layer of nanospheres. The regions of MQWs and PS nanospheres are indicated by red dash lines. (e) Normalized optical power, integrated over the MQW region, as a function of time. (f) Transmission haze ratio within the device simulated by RCWA analysis.
Figure 2SEM images of (a) the monolayer and (b) the multilayers of PS nanospheres. The nanospheres are coated with Au to avoid electron charging for SEM observation. (c) Photographs of the bare Si wafer surface and the one covered with multilayered nanospheres.
Figure 3Specular (a) reflectance and (b) transmittance measured with bare surface, monolayer and multilayer of PS nanospheres.
Figure 4(a) EQEs (b) J-V characteristics measured on the MQW solar cells with bare surface, monolayer and multilayer of PS nanospheres.
Photovoltaic characteristics of the MQW solar cells with different surface conditions.
| Surface Condition | Bare | Monolayer | Multilayer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Voc (V) | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Jsc (mA/cm2) | 0.85 | 0.93 | 0.95 |
| Fill Factor (%) | 27.58 | 32.03 | 32.74 |
| η (%) | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.59 |