Literature DB >> 27339557

A role for brain size and cognition in food webs.

Nicholas B Edmunds1, Frédéric Laberge1, Kevin S McCann1.   

Abstract

Predators tend to be large and mobile, enabling them to forage in spatially distinct food web compartments (e.g. littoral and pelagic aquatic macrohabitats). This feature can stabilise ecosystems when predators are capable of rapid behavioural response to changing resource conditions in distinct habitat compartments. However, what provides this ability to respond behaviourally has not been quantified. We hypothesised that predators require increased cognitive abilities to occupy their position in a food web, which puts pressure to increase brain size. Consistent with food web theory, we found that fish relative brain size increased with increased ability to forage across macrohabitats and increased relative trophic positions in a lacustrine food web, indicating that larger brains may afford the cognitive capacity to exploit various habitats flexibly, thus contributing to the stability of whole food webs.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive ability; food webs; habitat coupling; relative brain size; trophic position

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27339557     DOI: 10.1111/ele.12633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  10 in total

1.  Behavioral responses to annual temperature variation alter the dominant energy pathway, growth, and condition of a cold-water predator.

Authors:  Matthew M Guzzo; Paul J Blanchfield; Michael D Rennie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The effect of body size evolution and ecology on encephalization in cave bears and extant relatives.

Authors:  Kristof Veitschegger
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 3.  Extended spider cognition.

Authors:  Hilton F Japyassú; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Increased juvenile predation is not associated with evolved differences in adult brain size in Trinidadian killifish (Rivulus hartii).

Authors:  Shannon M Beston; Whitnee Broyles; Matthew R Walsh
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  One strategy does not fit all: determinants of urban adaptation in mammals.

Authors:  Luca Santini; Manuela González-Suárez; Danilo Russo; Alejandro Gonzalez-Voyer; Achaz von Hardenberg; Leonardo Ancillotto
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 11.274

6.  Predation pressure shapes brain anatomy in the wild.

Authors:  Alexander Kotrschal; Amy E Deacon; Anne E Magurran; Niclas Kolm
Journal:  Evol Ecol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.717

7.  Brain mass explains prey size selection better than beak, gizzard and body size in a benthivorous duck species.

Authors:  Karsten Laursen; Anders Pape Møller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Waterbird solves the string-pull test.

Authors:  Jessika Lamarre; David R Wilson
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Differences in brain morphology of brown trout across stream, lake, and hatchery environments.

Authors:  Libor Závorka; J Peter Koene; Tiffany A Armstrong; Lena Fehlinger; Colin E Adams
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Reduced exploration capacity despite brain volume increase in warm-acclimated common minnow.

Authors:  Libor Závorka; Barbara Koeck; Tiffany A Armstrong; Mustafa Soğanci; Amélie Crespel; Shaun S Killen
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.312

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.