Literature DB >> 27339108

Microsatellite diversity of the Nordic type of goats in relation to breed conservation: how relevant is pure ancestry?

J A Lenstra1, J Tigchelaar2, I Biebach3, J H Hallsson4, J Kantanen5,6, V H Nielsen7, F Pompanon8, S Naderi9, H-R Rezaei10, N Saether11, O Ertugrul12, C Grossen3, G Camenisch3, M Vos-Loohuis1, M van Straten2, E A de Poel2, J Windig13, K Oldenbroek2,13.   

Abstract

In the last decades, several endangered breeds of livestock species have been re-established effectively. However, the successful revival of the Dutch and Danish Landrace goats involved crossing with exotic breeds and the ancestry of the current populations is therefore not clear. We have generated genotypes for 27 FAO-recommended microsatellites of these landraces and three phenotypically similar Nordic-type landraces and compared these breeds with central European, Mediterranean and south-west Asian goats. We found decreasing levels of genetic diversity with increasing distance from the south-west Asian domestication site with a south-east-to-north-west cline that is clearly steeper than the Mediterranean east-to-west cline. In terms of genetic diversity, the Dutch Landrace comes next to the isolated Icelandic breed, which has an extremely low diversity. The Norwegian coastal goat and the Finnish and Icelandic landraces are clearly related. It appears that by a combination of mixed origin and a population bottleneck, the Dutch and Danish Land-races are separated from the other breeds. However, the current Dutch and Danish populations with the multicoloured and long-horned appearance effectively substitute for the original breed, illustrating that for conservation of cultural heritage, the phenotype of a breed is more relevant than pure ancestry and the genetic diversity of the original breed. More in general, we propose that for conservation, the retention of genetic diversity of an original breed and of the visual phenotype by which the breed is recognized and defined needs to be considered separately.
© 2016 The Authors. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics Published by Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conservation; diversity; goats; microsatellite

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27339108     DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet        ISSN: 0931-2668            Impact factor:   2.380


  4 in total

1.  Characteristics of the Allele Pool and the Genetic Differentiation of Goats of Different Breeds and their Wild Relatives by Str-Markers.

Authors:  M I Selionova; A-M M Aibazov; T V Mamontova; Iu A Stolpovsky; S V Beketov; S N Petrov; V R Kharzinova; A V Dotsev; N A Zinovieva
Journal:  Arch Razi Inst       Date:  2021-11-30

2.  Patterns of homozygosity in insular and continental goat breeds.

Authors:  Taina F Cardoso; Marcel Amills; Francesca Bertolini; Max Rothschild; Gabriele Marras; Geert Boink; Jordi Jordana; Juan Capote; Sean Carolan; Jón H Hallsson; Juha Kantanen; Agueda Pons; Johannes A Lenstra
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  New world goat populations are a genetically diverse reservoir for future use.

Authors:  Tiago do Prado Paim; Danielle Assis Faria; El Hamidi Hay; Concepta McManus; Maria Rosa Lanari; Laura Chaverri Esquivel; María Isabel Cascante; Esteban Jimenez Alfaro; Argerie Mendez; Olivardo Faco; Kleibe de Moraes Silva; Carlos Alberto Mezzadra; Arthur Mariante; Samuel Rezende Paiva; Harvey D Blackburn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Analysis of genome-wide DNA arrays reveals the genomic population structure and diversity in autochthonous Greek goat breeds.

Authors:  S Michailidou; G Th Tsangaris; A Tzora; I Skoufos; G Banos; A Argiriou; G Arsenos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.