Literature DB >> 27339067

Learning from social media: utilizing advanced data extraction techniques to understand barriers to breast cancer treatment.

Rachel A Freedman1, Kasisomayajula Viswanath2,3, Ines Vaz-Luis4, Nancy L Keating5,6.   

Abstract

Past examinations of breast cancer treatment barriers have typically included registry, claims-based, and smaller survey studies. We examined treatment barriers using a novel, comprehensive, social media analysis of online, candid discussions about breast cancer. Using an innovative toolset to search postings on social networks, message boards, patient communities, and topical sites, we performed a large-scale qualitative analysis. We examined the sentiments and barriers expressed about breast cancer treatments by Internet users during 1 year (2/1/14-1/31/15). We categorized posts based on thematic patterns and examined trends in discussions by race/ethnicity (white/black/Hispanic) when this information was available. We identified 1,024,041 unique posts related to breast cancer treatment. Overall, 57 % of posts expressed negative sentiments. Using machine learning software, we assigned treatment barriers for 387,238 posts (38 %). Barriers included emotional (23 % of posts), preferences and spiritual/religious beliefs (21 %), physical (18 %), resource (15 %), healthcare perceptions (9 %), treatment processes/duration (7 %), and relationships (7 %). Black and Hispanic (vs. white) users more frequently reported barriers related to healthcare perceptions, beliefs, and pre-diagnosis/diagnosis organizational challenges and fewer emotional barriers. Using a novel analysis of diverse social media users, we observed numerous breast cancer treatment barriers that differed by race/ethnicity. Social media is a powerful tool, allowing use of real-world data for qualitative research, capitalizing on the rich discussions occurring spontaneously online. Future research should focus on how to further employ and learn from this type of social intelligence research across all medical disciplines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Breast cancer; Qualitative research; Race and ethnicity; Underserved populations

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27339067      PMCID: PMC5537590          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3872-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  34 in total

1.  Differences in breast cancer survival by race--reply.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Silber; Paul R Rosenbaum; Kevin R Fox
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Disparities by Race, Age, and Sex in the Improvement of Survival for Major Cancers: Results From the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program in the United States, 1990 to 2010.

Authors:  Chenjie Zeng; Wanqing Wen; Alicia K Morgans; William Pao; Xiao-Ou Shu; Wei Zheng
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 3.  Depression as a predictor of adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) in women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Brent T Mausbach; Richard B Schwab; Scott A Irwin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Use of adjuvant trastuzumab in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer by race/ethnicity and education within the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Authors:  Rachel A Freedman; Melissa E Hughes; Rebecca A Ottesen; Jane C Weeks; Yulei He; Yu-Ning Wong; Richard Theriault; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Social and racial differences in selection of breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy regimens.

Authors:  Jennifer J Griggs; Eva Culakova; Melony E S Sorbero; Marek S Poniewierski; Debra A Wolff; Jeffrey Crawford; David C Dale; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Differences in patterns of depression after treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Teresa Deshields; Tiffany Tibbs; Ming-Yu Fan; Marie Taylor
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Underuse of breast cancer adjuvant treatment: patient knowledge, beliefs, and medical mistrust.

Authors:  Nina A Bickell; Jessica Weidmann; Kezhen Fei; Jenny J Lin; Howard Leventhal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Using social media in supportive and palliative care research.

Authors:  Carolina Casañas i Comabella; Marta Wanat
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.568

9.  Racial differences in definitive breast cancer therapy in older women: are they explained by the hospitals where patients undergo surgery?

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Elena Kouri; Yulei He; Jane C Weeks; Eric P Winer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Missed opportunities: racial disparities in adjuvant breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Nina A Bickell; Jason J Wang; Soji Oluwole; Deborah Schrag; Henry Godfrey; Karen Hiotis; Jane Mendez; Amber A Guth
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  10 in total

1.  Talking About My Care: Detecting Mentions of Hormonal Therapy Adherence Behavior in an Online Breast Cancer Community.

Authors:  Zhijun Yin; Wei Xie; Bradley A Malin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

Review 2.  The Bigger Picture: Picking the Right Soap Box-Is it Possible to Connect with Different Audience Targets (Practitioners and Patients) from the Same Platform?

Authors:  Mohammed Ali A Abbass; Hari B Keshava; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-09-12

Review 3.  Secondary Use of Recorded or Self-expressed Personal Data: Consumer Health Informatics and Education in the Era of Social Media and Health Apps.

Authors:  P Staccini; L Fernandez-Luque
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

4.  Patients' Perspective About the Cost of Diabetes Management: An Analysis of Online Health Communities.

Authors:  Catherine C Gao; Nataly R Espinoza Suarez; Freddy J K Toloza; Ariana S Malaga Zuniga; Sarah R McCarthy; Kasey R Boehmer; Lixia Yao; Sunyang Fu; Juan P Brito
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2021-09-17

5.  Application of Artificial Intelligence Methods to Pharmacy Data for Cancer Surveillance and Epidemiology Research: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrew E Grothen; Bethany Tennant; Catherine Wang; Andrea Torres; Bonny Bloodgood Sheppard; Glenn Abastillas; Marina Matatova; Jeremy L Warner; Donna R Rivera
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2020-11

6.  The association between social media use for health related information and compliance with breast and cervical cancer screenings.

Authors:  HyounKyoung G Park; Young-Il Kim; Warner K Huh; Sejong Bae
Journal:  Res Rep (Montgomery, Ala.)       Date:  2020-05-07

7.  Evaluation of Migraine Surgery Outcomes through Social Media.

Authors:  Katie G Egan; Jacqueline S Israel; Rezvaneh Ghasemzadeh; Ahmed M Afifi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-10-24

Review 8.  How Social Networks May Influence Cancer Patients' Situated Identity and Illness-Related Behaviors.

Authors:  Eric C Jones; Martin Storksdieck; Maria L Rangel
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-09-04

9.  Patient Experiences and Perceptions Associated with the Use of Desiccated Thyroid Extract.

Authors:  Freddy J K Toloza; Nataly R Espinoza Suarez; Omar El Kawkgi; Elizabeth H Golembiewski; Oscar J Ponce; Lixia Yao; Spyridoula Maraka; Naykky M Singh Ospina; Juan P Brito
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  Understanding the Public's Emotions about Cancer: Analysis of Social Media Data.

Authors:  Seul Ki Park; Hyeoun-Ae Park; Jooyun Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.