Literature DB >> 27338807

Concentration-Response Modeling of ECG Data From Early-Phase Clinical Studies as an Alternative Clinical and Regulatory Approach to Assessing QT Risk - Experience From the Development Program of Lemborexant.

Patricia J Murphy1, Sanae Yasuda2, Kenya Nakai2, Takashi Yoshinaga2, Nancy Hall1, Meijian Zhou3, Jagadeesh Aluri1, Bhaskar Rege1, Margaret Moline1, Jim Ferry1, Borje Darpo3,4.   

Abstract

Lemborexant is a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist being developed to treat insomnia. Its potential to cause QT prolongation was evaluated using plasma concentration-response (CR) modeling applied to data from 2 multiple ascending-dose (MAD) studies. In the primary MAD study, placebo or lemborexant (2.5 to 75 mg) was administered for 14 consecutive nights. In another MAD study designed to "bridge" pharmacokinetic and safety data between Japanese and non-Japanese subjects (J-MAD), placebo or lemborexant (2.5, 10, or 25 mg) was administered for 14 consecutive nights. QT intervals were estimated using a high-precision measurement technique and evaluated using a linear mixed-effects CR model, for each study separately and for the pooled data set. When each study was analyzed separately, the slopes of the CR relationship were shallow and not statistically significant. In the pooled analysis, the slope of the CR relationship was -0.00002 milliseconds per ng/mL (90%CI, -0.01019 to 0.01014 milliseconds). The highest observed Cmax was 400 ng/mL, representing a margin 8-fold above exposures expected for the highest planned clinical dose. The model-predicted QTc effect at 400 ng/mL was 1.1 milliseconds (90%CI, -3.49 to 5.78 milliseconds). In neither the J-MAD study nor the pooled analysis was an effect of race identified. CR modeling of data from early-phase clinical studies, including plasma levels far exceeding those anticipated clinically, indicated that a QT effect >10 milliseconds could be excluded. Regulatory agreement with this methodology demonstrates the effectiveness of a CR modeling approach as an alternative to thorough QT studies.
© 2016, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  QT; concentration-response modeling; early-phase clinical studies; thorough QT study

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27338807     DOI: 10.1002/jcph.785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  7 in total

1.  Cardiac risk assessment based on early Phase I data and PK-QTc analysis is concordant with the outcome of thorough QTc trials: an assessment based on eleven drug candidates.

Authors:  Puneet Gaitonde; Yeamin Huh; Borje Darpo; Georg Ferber; Günter Heimann; James Li; Kaifeng Lu; Bernard Sebastien; Kuenhi Tsai; Steve Riley
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Assessing QT/QTc interval prolongation with concentration-QT modeling for Phase I studies: impact of computational platforms, model structures and confidence interval calculation methods.

Authors:  Jingtao Lu; Jianguo Li; Gabriel Helmlinger; Nidal Al-Huniti
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 3.  Reverse Translation of US Food and Drug Administration Reviews of Oncology New Molecular Entities Approved in 2011-2017: Lessons Learned for Anticancer Drug Development.

Authors:  Stephanie Faucette; Santosh Wagh; Ashit Trivedi; Karthik Venkatakrishnan; Neeraj Gupta
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.689

4.  A Pooled Analysis of Three Randomized Phase I/IIa Clinical Trials Confirms Absence of a Clinically Relevant Effect on the QTc Interval by Umibecestat.

Authors:  Stefan Viktor Vormfelde; Nicole Pezous; Gilbert Lefèvre; Carine Kolly; Ulf Neumann; Pierre Jordaan; Mike Ufer; Eric Legangneux
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.689

5.  On-the-road driving performance the morning after bedtime administration of lemborexant in healthy adult and elderly volunteers.

Authors:  Annemiek Vermeeren; Stefan Jongen; Patricia Murphy; Margaret Moline; Gleb Filippov; Kate Pinner; Carlos Perdomo; Ishani Landry; Oneeb Majid; Anita C M Van Oers; Cees J Van Leeuwen; Johannes G Ramaekers; Eric F P M Vuurman
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.849

6.  Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of the Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist Lemborexant: Findings From Single-Dose and Multiple-Ascending-Dose Phase 1 Studies in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Ishani Landry; Kenya Nakai; Jim Ferry; Jagadeesh Aluri; Nancy Hall; Bojan Lalovic; Margaret L Moline
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev       Date:  2020-05-28

Review 7.  The New S7B/E14 Question and Answer Draft Guidance for Industry: Contents and Commentary.

Authors:  Borje Darpo; Georg Ferber
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.860

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.