Literature DB >> 27338764

New York Heart Association functional class, QRS duration, and survival in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: implications for cardiac resychronization therapy.

Frieder Braunschweig1,2, Cecilia Linde1,2, Lina Benson3, Marcus Ståhlberg1,2, Ulf Dahlström4, Lars H Lund1,2.   

Abstract

AIMS: Symptom severity assessed by NYHA functional class and QRS duration are essential criteria for selection of heart failure (HF) patients for CRT. This study assessed the relationship between NYHA class, QRS duration, and survival in a nationwide HF registry. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We studied 13 423 patients with HF in NYHA class II-IV and LVEF <40% in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. Survival was followed via the Swedish Population Registry. Of 12 534 patients without CRT (age 71 ± 12 years, 29% women), 51% and 49% were in NYHA class II and III-IV, respectively. Patients in NYHA class II compared with class III-IV were younger (69 vs. 73 years), and had a better systolic function (49% vs. 58% with LVEF <30%), P <0.001 for all, and a favourable co-morbidity profile. QRS duration was 116 ± 29 ms in NYHA class II and 119 ± 29 ms in NYHA class III-IV with QRS ≥120 ms found in 37% vs. 44%, and an LBBB in 23% vs. 28% (P < 0.001 for all). Upon multivariable Cox regression adjusting for 40 clinically relevant variables, mortality risk was higher in NYHA class III-IV vs. class II, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-1.40. Mortality was also higher with QRS prolongation ≥120 ms vs. narrow QRS. The HR in NYHA class II patients with non-LBBB was 1.19 (95% CI 1.05 - 1.36) and in those with LBBB it was 1.16 (95% CI 1.03-1.41). The corresponding HRs in NYHA class III-IV were 1.33 (95% CI 1.21-1.47) and 1.12 (95% CI 1.02-1.22). There was no significant interaction between the effects of NYHA class and QRS duration or morphology on mortality. Applying different scenarios to estimate guideline adherence, fewer patients with NYHA class II (range 14.4-42.6%) compared with NYHA class III-IV (18.0-45.4%) had received a CRT device when indicated.
CONCLUSIONS: In HF with reduced LVEF, QRS prolongation is common and independently linked to worse survival. The increase in mortality risk associated with QRS prolongation of both LBBB and non-LBBB morphology is similar in NYHA class II and III-IV.
© 2016 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure © 2016 European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Epidemiology; Heart failure; Left bundle branch block; NYHA functional class; QRS width

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27338764     DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail        ISSN: 1388-9842            Impact factor:   15.534


  8 in total

1.  One-Year Mortality Risk Stratification in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Construction of TSOC-HFrEF Risk Scoring Model.

Authors:  Wei-Kai Hung; Hao-Tien Liu; Chun-Chieh Wang; Chung-Chuan Chou; Ming-Shien Wen; Po-Cheng Chang
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 2.  Registry-Based Pragmatic Trials in Heart Failure: Current Experience and Future Directions.

Authors:  Lars H Lund; Jonas Oldgren; Stefan James
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-04

Review 3.  Mildly symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations.

Authors:  Alexandra Arvanitaki; Eleni Michou; Andreas Kalogeropoulos; Haralambos Karvounis; George Giannakoulas
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-05-05

4.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Patiromer and Spironolactone Therapy in Heart Failure Patients with Hyperkalemia.

Authors:  Mark Bounthavong; Javed Butler; Chantal M Dolan; Jeffrey D Dunn; Kathryn A Fisher; Nina Oestreicher; Bertram Pitt; Paul J Hauptman; David L Veenstra
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Health State Utilities of Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Gian Luca Di Tanna; Michael Urbich; Heidi S Wirtz; Barbara Potrata; Marieke Heisen; Craig Bennison; John Brazier; Gary Globe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Electronic healthcare records and external outcome data for hospitalized patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Linghong Cao; Rangui Chen; Yan Zhao; Lukai Lv; Ziyin Xu; Ping Xu
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 6.444

7.  Electro-echocardiographic Indices to Predict Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Non-response on Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ziqing Yu; Xueying Chen; Fei Han; Shengmei Qin; Minghui Li; Yuan Wu; Yangang Su; Junbo Ge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy in New York Heart Association class-IV patients dependent on intravenous drugs or invasive supportive treatments.

Authors:  Seong Soo Lee; Hee-Jin Kwon; Kyoung-Min Park; Young Keun On; June Soo Kim; Seung-Jung Park
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-08-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.