| Literature DB >> 27338575 |
Haipeng Wu1,2,3, Guangming Zeng4,5, Jie Liang6,7, Jin Chen3, Jijun Xu3, Juan Dai3, Xiaodong Li1,2, Ming Chen1,2, Piao Xu1,2, Yaoyu Zhou1,2, Fei Li1,2, Liang Hu1,2, Jia Wan1,2.
Abstract
Biochar and compost are seen as two attractive waste management options and are used for soil amendment and pollution remediation. The interaction between biochar and composting may improve the potential benefits of biochar and compost. We investigated soil physicochemical properties, bacterial community, bacterial 16S rRNA, and functional marker genes of nitrogen cycling of the soil remedied with nothing (S), compost (SC), biochar (SB), a mixture of compost and biochar (SBC), composted biochar (SBced), and a composted mixture of biochar and biomass (SBCing). The results were that all amendments (1) increased the bacterial community richness (except SB) and SBCing showed the greatest efficiency; (2) increased the bacterial community diversity (SBCing > SBC > SC > SBced > SB > S); and (3) changed the gene copy numbers of 16S rRNA, nirK, nirS, and nosZ genes of bacteria, ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA), and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB). All amendments (except SB) could increase the gene copy number of 16S rRNA, and SBCing had the greatest efficiency. The changes of soil bacterial community richness and diversity and the gene copy numbers of 16S rRNA, nirK, nirS, nosZ, AOA, and AOB would affect carbon and nitrogen cycling of the ecosystem and also implied that BCing had the greatest efficiency on soil amendment.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA; Bacterial community; Biochar; Compost; Functional marker genes; Soil amendment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27338575 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-016-7614-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ISSN: 0175-7598 Impact factor: 4.813