Literature DB >> 27337665

Lumbar Spinous Process-Splitting Laminoplasty: A Novel Technique for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.

Yaser M K Baghdadi, Charbel D Moussallem, Mohammed A Shuaib, Michelle J Clarke, Mark B Dekutoski, Ahmad N Nassr.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive posterior spinous process-splitting laminoplasty preserving the paraspinal musculature has been introduced to treat patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Despite its theoretical advantage of limiting muscular trauma, additional efforts are required to evaluate patients' clinical and functional results following this procedure. Between 2010 and 2012, 37 patients underwent spinous process-splitting laminoplasty for lumbar stenosis at a mean age of 68 years (range, 36-87 years) and were followed for minimum of 1 year (mean, 1.3 years). There were 22 (59%) men and 15 (41%) women. Mean number of levels treated with a spinous process-splitting laminoplasty was 2.2 (range, 1-6 levels). Patients had statistically significant improvements in their scores for all self-reported outcomes, including visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) components. Mean VAS significantly decreased by 4.4±3.2 points for back pain and 3.9±3.7 points for leg pain (P<.0001). Mean ODI significantly decreased by 17.5±19.1 points (P<.0001), and mean SF-36 significantly increased by 29±30.4 points (P=.0017) for the physical component and 21.8±25.6 points (P=.0062) for the mental health component. Four (10.8%) patients had a dural tear requiring repair (3 were intraoperative), 3 (8%) had an epidural hematoma requiring evacuation, 1 (2.7%) had an infection requiring irrigation and debridement, and 2 (5%) had additional decompression for symptom recurrence secondary to instability. Lumbar spinous process-splitting laminoplasty is a novel minimally invasive technique that provides adequate decompression for the neuronal elements and may avoid extensive paraspinal muscular damage associated with conventional laminectomy. Patients demonstrated significant improvements in pain and overall heath and function scores at a minimum 1-year follow-up. [Orthopedics.2016; 39(5):e950-e956.]. Copyright 2016, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27337665     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20160616-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  4 in total

1.  Comparative study of two spinous process (SP) osteotomy techniques for posterior decompression surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis: SP base versus splitting osteotomy.

Authors:  Gun Woo Lee; Myun-Whan Ahn
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression by 30° Arthroscopy in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Ju-Eun Kim; Dae-Jung Choi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-08-22

3.  Restoration of the Spinous Process Following Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process.

Authors:  Seung Myung Wi; Hui Jong Lee; Sam Yeol Chang; Oh Hyo Kwon; Choon-Ki Lee; Bong-Soon Chang; Hyoungmin Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-02-18

4.  Post-Operative Spinal Epidural Hematoma after Thoracic and Lumbar Spinous Process-Splitting Laminectomy for Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Yawara Eguchi; Munetaka Suzuki; Takashi Sato; Hajime Yamanaka; Hiroshi Tamai; Tatsuya Kobayashi; Sumihisa Orita; Miyako Suzuki; Kazuhide Inage; Hirohito Kanamoto; Koki Abe; Masaki Norimoto; Tomotaka Umimura; Yasuchika Aoki; Masao Koda; Takeo Furuya; Junichi Nakamura; Tsutomu Akazawa; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2019-01-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.