Literature DB >> 27337599

The impact of work-matched interval training on V̇O2peak and V̇O2 kinetics: diminishing returns with increasing intensity.

James P Raleigh1, Matthew D Giles1, Trisha D Scribbans1, Brittany A Edgett1, Laura J Sawula1, Jacob T Bonafiglia1, Ryan B Graham2, Brendon J Gurd1.   

Abstract

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) improves peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2peak) and oxygen uptake (V̇O2) kinetics, however, it is unknown whether an optimal intensity of HIIT exists for eliciting improvements in these measures of whole-body oxidative metabolism. The purpose of this study was to (i) investigate the effect of interval intensity on training-induced adaptations in V̇O2peak and V̇O2 kinetics, and (ii) examine the impact of interval intensity on the frequency of nonresponders in V̇O2peak. Thirty-six healthy men and women completed 3 weeks of cycle ergometer HIIT, consisting of intervals targeting 80% (LO), 115% (MID), or 150% (HI) of peak aerobic power. Total work performed per training session was matched across groups. A main effect of training (p < 0.05) and a significant interaction effect was observed for V̇O2peak, with the change in V̇O2peak being greater (p < 0.05) in the MID group than the LO group; however, no differences were observed between the HI group and either the MID or LO groups (ΔV̇O2peak; LO, 2.7 ± 0.7 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1); MID, 5.8 ± 0.7; HI, 4.2 ± 1.0). The greatest proportion of responders was observed in the MID group (LO, 8/12; MID, 12/13; HI, 9/11). A nonsignificant relationship (p = 0.26; r(2) = 0.04) was found between the changes in V̇O2peak and τV̇O2. These results suggest that training at intensities around V̇O2peak may represent a threshold intensity above which further increases in training intensity provide no additional adaptive benefit. The dissociation between changes in V̇O2peak and V̇O2 kinetics also reflects the different underlying mechanisms regulating these adaptations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIIT; V̇O2 de pointe; V̇O2 kinetics; V̇O2peak; cinétique du V̇O2; entraînement physique; exercise training; intensity; intensité; non-répondeurs; nonresponders; travail apparié; work-matched

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27337599     DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  13 in total

1.  Can We Draw General Conclusions from Interval Training Studies?

Authors:  Ricardo Borges Viana; Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira; João Pedro Araújo Naves; Victor Silveira Coswig; Fabrício Boscolo Del Vecchio; Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Carlos Alexandre Vieira; Paulo Gentil
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Change in VO2max and time trial performance in response to high-intensity interval training prescribed using ventilatory threshold.

Authors:  Todd A Astorino; Jamie deRevere; Theodore Anderson; Erin Kellogg; Patrick Holstrom; Sebastian Ring; Nicholas Ghaseb
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Exploring Differences in Cardiorespiratory Fitness Response Rates Across Varying Doses of Exercise Training: A Retrospective Analysis of Eight Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Jacob T Bonafiglia; Nicholas Preobrazenski; Hashim Islam; Jeremy J Walsh; Robert Ross; Neil M Johannsen; Corby K Martin; Timothy S Church; Cris A Slentz; Leanna M Ross; William E Kraus; Glen P Kenny; Gary S Goldfield; Denis Prud'homme; Ronald J Sigal; Conrad P Earnest; Brendon J Gurd
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Effect of Interval Training on the Factors Influencing Maximal Oxygen Consumption: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Rosenblat; Cesare Granata; Scott G Thomas
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 11.928

5.  Commentary: High-intensity Intermittent Training vs. Moderate-intensity Intermittent Training: Is It a Matter of Intensity or Intermittent Efforts?

Authors:  Paulo Gentil; Fabrício B Del Vecchio
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Short-term pre-operative high-intensity interval training does not improve fitness of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Catherine L Boereboom; James E M Blackwell; John P Williams; Bethan E Phillips; Jonathan N Lund
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 7.  An appraisal of the SDIR as an estimate of true individual differences in training responsiveness in parallel-arm exercise randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jacob T Bonafiglia; Andrea M Brennan; Robert Ross; Brendon J Gurd
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2019-07

8.  Changes in VO2max and cardiac output in response to short-term high-intensity interval training in Caucasian and Hispanic young women: A pilot study.

Authors:  Jamie L De Revere; Rasmus D Clausen; Todd A Astorino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Moving beyond threshold-based dichotomous classification to improve the accuracy in classifying non-responders.

Authors:  Jacob T Bonafiglia; Matthew W Nelms; Nicholas Preobrazenski; Camille LeBlanc; Lauren Robins; Simo Lu; Alexander Lithopoulos; Jeremy J Walsh; Brendon J Gurd
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2018-11

10.  Effects of high vs moderate-intensity intermittent training on functionality, resting heart rate and blood pressure of elderly women.

Authors:  Victor Silveira Coswig; Matheus Barbalho; Rodolfo Raiol; Fabrício Boscolo Del Vecchio; Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Paulo Gentil
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.