Literature DB >> 27337566

Cryptic individual scaling relationships and the evolution of morphological scaling.

Austin P Dreyer1, Omid Saleh Ziabari2, Eli M Swanson3, Akshita Chawla4, W Anthony Frankino5, Alexander W Shingleton6.   

Abstract

Morphological scaling relationships between organ and body size-also known as allometries-describe the shape of a species, and the evolution of such scaling relationships is central to the generation of morphological diversity. Despite extensive modeling and empirical tests, however, the modes of selection that generate changes in scaling remain largely unknown. Here, we mathematically model the evolution of the group-level scaling as an emergent property of individual-level variation in the developmental mechanisms that regulate trait and body size. We show that these mechanisms generate a "cryptic individual scaling relationship" unique to each genotype in a population, which determines body and trait size expressed by each individual, depending on developmental nutrition. We find that populations may have identical population-level allometries but very different underlying patterns of cryptic individual scaling relationships. Consequently, two populations with apparently the same morphological scaling relationship may respond very differently to the same form of selection. By focusing on the developmental mechanisms that regulate trait size and the patterns of cryptic individual scaling relationships they produce, our approach reveals the forms of selection that should be most effective in altering morphological scaling, and directs researcher attention on the actual, hitherto overlooked, targets of selection.
© 2016 The Author(s). Evolution © 2016 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allometry; body proportion; body size; mathematical modelling; morphological scaling; nutrition; shape

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27337566     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  6 in total

1.  Why does allometry evolve so slowly?

Authors:  David Houle; Luke T Jones; Ryan Fortune; Jacqueline L Sztepanacz
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

2.  Insulin-insensitivity of male genitalia maintains reproductive success in Drosophila.

Authors:  Austin P Dreyer; Alexander W Shingleton
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Where does diversity come from? Linking geographical patterns of morphological, genetic, and environmental variation in wall lizards.

Authors:  Antigoni Kaliontzopoulou; Catarina Pinho; Fernando Martínez-Freiría
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Variation in an Extreme Weapon: Horn Performance Differences across Rhinoceros Beetle (Trypoxylus dichotomus) Populations.

Authors:  Benjamin Buchalski; Eric Gutierrez; Douglas Emlen; Laura Lavine; Brook Swanson
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.769

Review 5.  Individual Cryptic Scaling Relationships and the Evolution of Animal Form.

Authors:  W Anthony Frankino; Eric Bakota; Ian Dworkin; Gerald S Wilkinson; Jason B Wolf; Alexander W Shingleton
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  The sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alexander W Shingleton; Josephine R Masandika; Lily S Thorsen; Yuqing Zhu; Christen K Mirth
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.963

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.