Literature DB >> 27336211

Does salpingectomy have a deleterious impact on ovarian response in in vitro fertilization cycles?

Sang-Hee Yoon1, Ji Young Lee2, Soo-Nyung Kim2, Hye Won Chung3, So Yun Park4, Chulmin Lee5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of salpingectomy in patients with IVF treatment on ovarian response.
DESIGN: Meta-analysis.
SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Patients under treatment for infertility, during the cycles before and after treatment by salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx or ectopic pregnancy. INTERVENTION(S): PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE databases, and CENTRAL in Cochrane Library up to July 2015. Either a fixed- or a random-effects model was used to calculate the overall combined risk estimates. The subgroup analysis was planned a priori before data were collected and analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The amount of gonadotropin administered, the peak E2 level, the number of oocytes retrieved, and the number of pregnancies. RESULT(S): After the final screening, 12 of the studies were retrospective and six were prospective. In this meta-analysis, 1,482 patients were enrolled, including a total of 657 patients with salpingectomy and 825 without salpingectomy. The comparisons before and after salpingectomy of the peak E2 level (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.182; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.166, 0.101; I2, 85.45%), the total gonadotropin dose used for stimulation (SMD = 0.127; 95% CI, -0.054 0.308; I2, 84.49%), and number of oocytes retrieved (SMD = -0.060; 95% CI, -0.189, 0.070; I2, 63.93%) did not reveal any significant differences. The number of pregnancies before and after salpingectomy did not differ significantly (odds ratio [OR] = 1.180; 95% CI, 0.854, 1.630; I2, 34.01%). CONCLUSION(S): Salpingectomy in infertile patients does not have any negative effect on their subsequent fertility treatment, but further studies should be performed before this result can be considered definitive.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Salpingectomy; in vitro fertilization; ovarian response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27336211     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.05.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  4 in total

Review 1.  Salpingectomy before assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Marco Noventa; Salvatore Gizzo; Carlo Saccardi; Shara Borgato; Amerigo Vitagliano; Michela Quaranta; Pietro Litta; Michele Gangemi; Guido Ambrosini; Donato D'Antona; Stefano Palomba
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.234

2.  Pyosalpinges after hysterosalpingography in a patient with lower genital tract infection and managed by laparoscopic surgery in a resource low tertiary hospital case report and literature review.

Authors:  Thomas Obinchemti Egbe; Fidelia Mbi Kobenge; Metogo Mbengono Junette Arlette; Eugene Belley-Priso
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2018-04-13

3.  Salpingectomy may decrease antral follicle count but not live birth rate for IVF-ET patients aged 35-39 years: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Tong Chen; Feiyan Zhao; Qin Wang; Chang Liu; Yonglian Lan; Shuyu Wang; Zhimin Xin; Xiaokui Yang
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.234

4.  Prior salpingectomy impairs the retrieved oocyte number in in vitro fertilization cycles of women under 35 years old without optimal ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Cheng-Yu Ho; Yu-Yuan Chang; Yu-Hung Lin; Mei-Jou Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.