| Literature DB >> 27335784 |
M Raghavendran1, A Venugopal2, V Ranjit1, Vinay N Kaushik1.
Abstract
A 30-year old infertile male was admitted for microsurgical sub inguinal varicocelectomy. Intraoperatively, two tubular structures of the caliber of neighboring veins were noted. They were distinct from the vas, which was carefully preserved. Histopathology revealed varicose veins along with two convoluted tubular structures lined by ciliated pseudo-stratified epithelium. There was an incomplete thin muscle coat. The lumina were irregular and contained no spermatozoa (Fig. 1). These structures were identified as paradidymis based on the location in the cord and microscopic morphology. We have tried to analyze the medico-legal significance of these benign lesions in our every day practice.Entities:
Keywords: Mesonephric duct; Paradidymis; Testicular and epididymal appendages; Varicocele; Varicocelectomy; Vas deferens
Year: 2016 PMID: 27335784 PMCID: PMC4909499 DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2016.03.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Urol Case Rep ISSN: 2214-4420
Figure 1Microscopic appearance of paradidymis (P) in the spermatic cord, amidst the dilated veins (V).