Literature DB >> 27335422

The paradox of inverted biomass pyramids in kelp forest fish communities.

Rowan Trebilco1, Nicholas K Dulvy2, Sean C Anderson2, Anne K Salomon3.   

Abstract

Theory predicts that bottom-heavy biomass pyramids or 'stacks' should predominate in real-world communities if trophic-level increases with body size (mean predator-to-prey mass ratio (PPMR) more than 1). However, recent research suggests that inverted biomass pyramids (IBPs) characterize relatively pristine reef fish communities. Here, we estimated the slope of a kelp forest fish community biomass spectrum from underwater visual surveys. The observed biomass spectrum slope is strongly positive, reflecting an IBP. This is incongruous with theory because this steep positive slope would only be expected if trophic position decreased with increasing body size (consumer-to-resource mass ratio, less than 1). We then used δ(15)N signatures of fish muscle tissue to quantify the relationship between trophic position and body size and instead detected strong evidence for the opposite, with PPMR ≈ 1650 (50% credible interval 280-12 000). The natural history of kelp forest reef fishes suggests that this paradox could arise from energetic subsidies in the form of movement of mobile consumers across habitats, and from seasonally pulsed production inputs at small body sizes. There were four to five times more biomass at large body sizes (1-2 kg) than would be expected in a closed steady-state community providing a measure of the magnitude of subsidies.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ecosystem baseline; fractionation; habitat complexity; size spectra; species interaction; stable isotope analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27335422      PMCID: PMC4936041          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  18 in total

1.  How does abundance scale with body size in coupled size-structured food webs?

Authors:  Julia L Blanchard; Simon Jennings; Richard Law; Matthew D Castle; Paul McCloghrie; Marie-Joëlle Rochet; Eric Benoît
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.091

2.  Resources from another place and time: responses to pulses in a spatially subsidized system.

Authors:  Wendy B Anderson; D Alexander Wait; Paul Stapp
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Salmon subsidize an escape from a size spectrum.

Authors:  Morgan D Hocking; Nicholas K Dulvy; John D Reynolds; Richard A Ring; Thomas E Reimchen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Ecosystem ecology: size-based constraints on the pyramids of life.

Authors:  Rowan Trebilco; Julia K Baum; Anne K Salomon; Nicholas K Dulvy
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Energy and the Scaling of Animal Space Use.

Authors:  Natascia Tamburello; Isabelle M Côté; Nicholas K Dulvy
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Overestimating fish counts by non-instantaneous visual censuses: consequences for population and community descriptions.

Authors:  Christine Ward-Paige; Joanna Mills Flemming; Heike K Lotze
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Scaling metabolism from individuals to reef-fish communities at broad spatial scales.

Authors:  D R Barneche; M Kulbicki; S R Floeter; A M Friedlander; J Maina; A P Allen
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Variability in isotope discrimination factors in coral reef fishes: implications for diet and food web reconstruction.

Authors:  Alex S J Wyatt; Anya M Waite; Stuart Humphries
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Variability in abundance of temperate reef fishes estimated by visual census.

Authors:  Alejo J Irigoyen; David E Galván; Leonardo A Venerus; Ana M Parma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Rescaling the trophic structure of marine food webs.

Authors:  Nigel E Hussey; M Aaron Macneil; Bailey C McMeans; Jill A Olin; Sheldon F J Dudley; Geremy Cliff; Sabine P Wintner; Sean T Fennessy; Aaron T Fisk
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 9.492

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Pyramids and cascades: a synthesis of food chain functioning and stability.

Authors:  Matthieu Barbier; Michel Loreau
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 9.492

2.  Resetting predator baselines in coral reef ecosystems.

Authors:  Darcy Bradley; Eric Conklin; Yannis P Papastamatiou; Douglas J McCauley; Kydd Pollock; Amanda Pollock; Bruce E Kendall; Steven D Gaines; Jennifer E Caselle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  A unifying theory for top-heavy ecosystem structure in the ocean.

Authors:  C Brock Woodson; John R Schramski; Samantha B Joye
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Human and environmental gradients predict catch, effort, and species composition in a large Micronesian coral-reef fishery.

Authors:  Javier Cuetos-Bueno; Dalia Hernandez-Ortiz; Curtis Graham; Peter Houk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Expanded consumer niche widths may signal an early response to spatial protection.

Authors:  Angeleen M Olson; Rowan Trebilco; Anne K Salomon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Community size structure varies with predator-prey size relationships and temperature across Australian reefs.

Authors:  Amy Rose Coghlan; Julia L Blanchard; Freddie J Heather; Rick D Stuart-Smith; Graham J Edgar; Asta Audzijonyte
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Systematic variation in food web body-size structure linked to external subsidies.

Authors:  Daniel M Perkins; Isabelle Durance; Michelle Jackson; J Iwan Jones; Rasmus B Lauridsen; Katrin Layer-Dobra; Julia Reiss; Murray S A Thompson; Guy Woodward
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.703

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.