Literature DB >> 27335409

Neural Global Pattern Similarity Underlies True and False Memories.

Zhifang Ye1, Bi Zhu1, Liping Zhuang1, Zhonglin Lu2, Chuansheng Chen3, Gui Xue4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The neural processes giving rise to human memory strength signals remain poorly understood. Inspired by formal computational models that posit a central role of global matching in memory strength, we tested a novel hypothesis that the strengths of both true and false memories arise from the global similarity of an item's neural activation pattern during retrieval to that of all the studied items during encoding (i.e., the encoding-retrieval neural global pattern similarity [ER-nGPS]). We revealed multiple ER-nGPS signals that carried distinct information and contributed differentially to true and false memories: Whereas the ER-nGPS in the parietal regions reflected semantic similarity and was scaled with the recognition strengths of both true and false memories, ER-nGPS in the visual cortex contributed solely to true memory. Moreover, ER-nGPS differences between the parietal and visual cortices were correlated with frontal monitoring processes. By combining computational and neuroimaging approaches, our results advance a mechanistic understanding of memory strength in recognition. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: What neural processes give rise to memory strength signals, and lead to our conscious feelings of familiarity? Using fMRI, we found that the memory strength of a given item depends not only on how it was encoded during learning, but also on the similarity of its neural representation with other studied items. The global neural matching signal, mainly in the parietal lobule, could account for the memory strengths of both studied and unstudied items. Interestingly, a different global matching signal, originated from the visual cortex, could distinguish true from false memories. The findings reveal multiple neural mechanisms underlying the memory strengths of events registered in the brain.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/366792-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DRM; fMRI; false memory; global matching models; neural global pattern similarity; recognition

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27335409      PMCID: PMC6601745          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0425-16.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  6 in total

1.  Neural specificity of scene representations is related to memory performance in childhood.

Authors:  Yana Fandakova; Sarah Leckey; Charles C Driver; Silvia A Bunge; Simona Ghetti
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Eye movements support behavioral pattern completion.

Authors:  Jordana S Wynn; Jennifer D Ryan; Bradley R Buchsbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Spaced Learning Enhances Episodic Memory by Increasing Neural Pattern Similarity Across Repetitions.

Authors:  Kanyin Feng; Xiao Zhao; Jing Liu; Ying Cai; Zhifang Ye; Chuansheng Chen; Gui Xue
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neural Pattern Similarity Differentially Relates to Memory Performance in Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Verena R Sommer; Yana Fandakova; Thomas H Grandy; Yee Lee Shing; Markus Werkle-Bergner; Myriam C Sander
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Transformative neural representations support long-term episodic memory.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Hui Zhang; Tao Yu; Liankun Ren; Duanyu Ni; Qinhao Yang; Baoqing Lu; Liang Zhang; Nikolai Axmacher; Gui Xue
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Age Effects on Neural Discriminability and Monitoring Process During Memory Retrieval for Auditory Words.

Authors:  Xuhao Shao; Wenzhi Liu; Ying Guo; Bi Zhu
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 5.702

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.