Brad R Ruhfel1, Claudia P Bove2, C Thomas Philbrick3, Charles C Davis4. 1. Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Kentucky University, 521 Lancaster Avenue, Richmond, Kentucky 40475 USA Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Herbaria, Harvard University, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 USA brad.ruhfel@eku.edu. 2. Departamento de Botânica, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, Rio de Janeiro 20940-040, Brazil. 3. Biological & Environmental Sciences, Western Connecticut State University, 181 White Street, Danbury, Connecticut 06810 USA. 4. Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Herbaria, Harvard University, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 USA.
Abstract
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: The clusioid clade (Malpighiales) has an ancient fossil record (∼90 Ma) and extant representatives exhibit a pantropical distribution represented on all former Gondwanan landmasses (Africa, Australia, India, Madagascar, and South America) except Antarctica. Several biogeographers have hypothesized that the clusioid distribution is an example of Gondwanan vicariance. Our aim is to test the hypothesis that the modern distribution of the clusioid clade is largely explained by Gondwanan fragmentation. METHODS: Using a four gene, 207-taxon data set we simultaneously estimated the phylogeny and divergence times of the clusioid clade using a Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Ancestral Area Reconstructions (AARs) were then conducted on a distribution of 1000 trees and summarized on a reduced phylogeny. KEY RESULTS: Divergence time estimates and AARs revealed only two or four cladogenic events that are potentially consistent with Gondwanan vicariance, depending on the placement of the ancient fossil Paleoclusia. In contrast, dispersal occurred on > 25% of the branches, indicating the current distribution of the clade likely reflects extensive recent dispersal during the Cenozoic (< 65 Ma), most of which occurred after the beginning of the Eocene (∼56 Ma). CONCLUSIONS: These results support growing evidence that suggests many traditionally recognized angiosperm clades (families and genera) are too young for their distributions to have been influenced strictly by Gondwanan fragmentation. Instead, it appears that corridors of dispersal may be the best explanation for numerous angiosperm clades with Gondwanan distributions.
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: The clusioid clade (Malpighiales) has an ancient fossil record (∼90 Ma) and extant representatives exhibit a pantropical distribution represented on all former Gondwanan landmasses (Africa, Australia, India, Madagascar, and South America) except Antarctica. Several biogeographers have hypothesized that the clusioid distribution is an example of Gondwanan vicariance. Our aim is to test the hypothesis that the modern distribution of the clusioid clade is largely explained by Gondwanan fragmentation. METHODS: Using a four gene, 207-taxon data set we simultaneously estimated the phylogeny and divergence times of the clusioid clade using a Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Ancestral Area Reconstructions (AARs) were then conducted on a distribution of 1000 trees and summarized on a reduced phylogeny. KEY RESULTS: Divergence time estimates and AARs revealed only two or four cladogenic events that are potentially consistent with Gondwanan vicariance, depending on the placement of the ancient fossil Paleoclusia. In contrast, dispersal occurred on > 25% of the branches, indicating the current distribution of the clade likely reflects extensive recent dispersal during the Cenozoic (< 65 Ma), most of which occurred after the beginning of the Eocene (∼56 Ma). CONCLUSIONS: These results support growing evidence that suggests many traditionally recognized angiosperm clades (families and genera) are too young for their distributions to have been influenced strictly by Gondwanan fragmentation. Instead, it appears that corridors of dispersal may be the best explanation for numerous angiosperm clades with Gondwanan distributions.
Authors: Ana M Bedoya; Bradley R Ruhfel; C Thomas Philbrick; Santiago Madriñán; Claudia P Bove; Attila Mesterházy; Richard G Olmstead Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Michael D Pirie; Martha Kandziora; Nicolai M Nürk; Nicholas C Le Maitre; Ana Mugrabi de Kuppler; Berit Gehrke; Edward G H Oliver; Dirk U Bellstedt Journal: BMC Evol Biol Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 3.260
Authors: Kevin Kit Siong Ng; Masaki J Kobayashi; Jeffrey A Fawcett; Masaomi Hatakeyama; Timothy Paape; Chin Hong Ng; Choon Cheng Ang; Lee Hong Tnah; Chai Ting Lee; Tomoaki Nishiyama; Jun Sese; Michael J O'Brien; Dario Copetti; Mohd Noor Mat Isa; Robert Cyril Ong; Mahardika Putra; Iskandar Z Siregar; Sapto Indrioko; Yoshiko Kosugi; Ayako Izuno; Yuji Isagi; Soon Leong Lee; Kentaro K Shimizu Journal: Commun Biol Date: 2021-10-07
Authors: Liming Cai; Zhenxiang Xi; Kylee Peterson; Catherine Rushworth; Jeremy Beaulieu; Charles C Davis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 3.240